期刊文献+

互联网学术信息质量启发式评价中存在的问题分析 被引量:6

Analysis on the Issue of Heuristic Evaluation of Internet Academic Information Quality
原文传递
导出
摘要 从用户的视角探讨互联网学术信息质量启发式评价中存在的问题。研究发现,图书馆等服务人员要加强互联网信息资源评价服务的宣传和覆盖率,并提高评价工具的可操作性。部分用户的评价能力欠缺影响启发式工具的使用效果,但大部分用户具备一定的评价Web学术信息质量的能力,许多高校学生在信息查寻行为中没有或很少使用启发式原则或标准的症结在于评价动机而不在于评价能力。 From the perspective of users,this article explores the issue of heuristic evaluation of quality of Internet academic information based on previous empirical studies.It comes to several conclusions: Firstly,service providers such as libraries should take some measures to strengthen the publicity of the services of Internet academic information evaluation,let more users accept the services and improve the operability of evaluation tools.Secondly,some users' poor ability has a negative effect on the use of heuristic tools,but most users have sufficient ability to evaluate the Internet academic information.And finally,the motivation is the very critical factor that influences the evaluation,and the crux that college students don't use or seldom use the heuristic principles or standards in the process of information seeking is their attitude instead of ability.
作者 胡磊
出处 《情报科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第2期178-181,共4页 Information Science
关键词 互联网 学术信息 信息质量 启发式评价 用户 internet academic information information quality heuristic evaluation users
  • 相关文献

参考文献27

  • 1Online Computer Library Center, Inc.. OCLC White Paper on the Information Habits of College Students: How Academic Librarians Car/Influence Students' Web-Based Information Choices (2002) [R/OL].http://www5.oclc.org/downloads/community/informationhabits.pdf,2009-12-21.
  • 2LUBANS J. How first-year university students use and regard Internet resources (1998) [J/OL].www.lib.duke.edu/staff/ orgnztn/lubans/docs/1 styear/firstyear.htm,2009-10-22.
  • 3FRED R V H. The Undergraduate Research Paper and Electronic Resources: A Cautionary Tale [J]. Teaching History, 1998, 23(2): 51-59.
  • 4ROTHENBERG D. How the Web destroys student research papers[J]. Chronicles of Higher Education, 1997, 43(49): 44- 45.
  • 5STEPP L. Point, Click, Think? As Students Rely on the Internet for Research, Teachers Try to Warn of the Web's Snares [N]. Washington Post, 2002-7-16 (C01).ORR G J. Trends in Distant Student Use of Electronic Resources: A Survey[J]. College & Research Library, 2003,(3): 176-191.
  • 6BURTON V T, CHADWICK S A. Investigating the Practices of Student Researchers: Patterns of Use and Criteria for Use of Internet and Library Sources [J]. Computers and Composition, 2000, 17(3): 309 - 328.
  • 7METZGER M J, FLANAGIN A J, ZWARUN L. College student Web use, perceptions of information credibility, and verification behavior[J]. Computers & Education, 2003,41(3) : 271-290.
  • 8GRIMES D J, BOENING C H. Worries with the Web: A Look at Student Use of Web Resources [J]. College and Research Libraries, 2001, 62(1): 11-23.
  • 9王建涛,胡明玲.质量受控学科信息门户研究[J].图书情报工作,2004,48(9):34-37. 被引量:11
  • 10傅蓉.开放存取的质量控制[J].情报理论与实践,2006,29(6):694-696. 被引量:13

二级参考文献46

共引文献45

同被引文献78

引证文献6

二级引证文献44

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部