摘要
《侵权责任法》试图建立一元化结构的医疗损害责任制度,引致《医疗事故处理条例》(《条例》)的存废之争。作者认为,围绕医患纠纷的民事赔偿法律规制,今后绝不会归于"一元化",而是继续保持甚至愈加"多元化"的态势。《侵权责任法》与《条例》肯定将并行不悖、各有侧重与分工。除《条例》将继续发挥规制作用外,对于《侵权责任法》生效之前诊疗行为结束并已出现损害后果的案例,事发当时有效的其他含有侵权责任规定的法律可能被优先适用,国际公约《经济、社会和文化权利国际公约》第12条及其拓展性文件规定了庞杂的"健康权"相关内容,亦不排除被优先于《侵权责任法》适用的可能性。
The Tort Law intends to establish a unitary structure of the medical malpractice liability system, which has evoked the argument of preservation or abolition of Regulations on Handling Medical Accidents （ the Ordinance）. The author be- lieves that the civil compensation medical dispute surrounding the legal regulation in the future will not be attributed to the ＂unification＂ , but will continue to maintain and even become more ＂diversified＂. Tort Law and ＂regulations＂ will certainly fo- cus on different issues. In addition to the fact that the ＂Regulations＂ will eontinue to play a role in regulation, other effective law including tort liability provisions may be still applied to these eases which have resulted in medical malpractices before the Tort Law becomes valid or after diagnosis and treatment have been completed. The 12th Act of ＂Economic, Social and Cultural Rights ＂ of the International Pact and expansion doeuments define numerous contents related to ＂health rights ＂. So it is possible that these acts and documents may be applied before the Tort Law.
出处
《临床误诊误治》
2011年第2期5-7,共3页
Clinical Misdiagnosis & Mistherapy
关键词
责任
法律
侵权责任法
医疗损害
Liability, legal
Tort Law
Medical malpractice
