期刊文献+

发展中国家知识产权保护程度相对评价方法研究 被引量:4

Research on the Comparative Appraisal Method of Intellectual Property Right Protection in Developing Countries——From the Perspective of Influencing Factors of Intellectual Property Right Protection
原文传递
导出
摘要 在发达国家持续施压的情况下,合理评价现有知识产权保护程度的适宜性,是发展中国家决定知识产权保护政策趋向的基础。在回顾和评价已有知识产权保护程度评价方法相关研究的基础上指出,为了更为直接、有效地为决策服务,发展中国家应该从知识产权保护程度影响因素的视角对现有知识产权保护程度采取一种相对性的评价。分析了知识产权保护程度的影响因素,提出发展中国家知识产权保护程度相对评价法的思路,指出应分产业来评价现有知识产权保护程度与该产业发展阶段、技术水平、市场结构及创新活动特征等要素之间的适宜情况,探究了知识产权保护程度评价的基本模型及基于证据理论的评价过程,并以实例给予了演示说明。 Under the pressure from the developed countries constantly,appraising the present level of intellectual property right protection reasonably is the fundamental work for the developing countries to design appropriate policy.After reviewing correlative previous studies,this paper takes for that the level of intellectual property right protection of developing countries should be appraised comparatively from the perspective of influencing factors.Based on analyzing the influencing factors of intellectual property right protection of developing countries,the paper presents the essential of the comparative appraisal method,and points out that the matching state between the present level of intellectual property right protection and the reality of one industry(including development phase,technological level,market structure,and characters of innovation) should be appraised in the comparative appraisal method.Then,the paper discusses the basic model of the comparative appraisal method and process based on the theory of evidence,and gives an appraisal case.
作者 洪勇 吴勇
出处 《科学学与科学技术管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第2期36-42,116,共8页 Science of Science and Management of S.& T.
基金 国家软科学研究项目(2009GXS1D025) 辽宁经济社会发展课题(2010lslktglx-10)
关键词 知识产权保护程度 相对评价法 影响因素 证据理论 level of intellectual property right protection comparative appraisal method influencing factors the theory of evidence
  • 相关文献

参考文献35

  • 1Thurow L C. Needed: A new system of intellectual property rights[J]. Harvard Business Review, 1997, 75(5): 94-103.
  • 2UNCTAD-ICTSD. Intellectual property rights: Implications for development[R]. Switzerland: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, 2003.
  • 3CIPR. Integrating intellectual property rights and developm- ent policy[R]. London: Commission on Intellectual Property Rights, 2002.
  • 4Nordhaus treatment 1969 of technological growth, and welfare: A theoretical change[M]. Cambridge: MIT Press,.
  • 5Scherer F M. Nordhaus' theory of optimal patent life: A geom- etric reinterpretation[J]. American Economic: Review,1972,62 (3): 422-427.
  • 6Merges R P, Nelson R R. On the complex economics of patent scope[J]. Columbia Law Review, 1990, 90(4): 839-916.
  • 7Klemperer P. How broad should the scope of patent prote- ction be?[J]. RAND Journal of Economics, 1990, 21(1):113- 130.
  • 8Rapp R T, Rozek B P. Benefits and costs of intellectual pr- operty protection in developing countries[J]. Journal of World trade, 1990, 24(5): 75-102.
  • 9Ginarte J C, Park W G. Determinants of patent rights: A cross- national study[J]. Research Policy, 1997, 26(3): 283-301.
  • 10韩玉雄,李怀祖.关于中国知识产权保护水平的定量分析[J].科学学研究,2005,23(3):377-382. 被引量:373

二级参考文献180

共引文献565

同被引文献44

引证文献4

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部