期刊文献+

脓毒症大鼠循环内皮祖细胞的数量变化及其意义 被引量:3

Change in number of circulating endothelial progenitor cells and its significance in septic rats
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 观察并分析脓毒症时循环内皮祖细胞(cEPCs)数量变化及其意义.方法 采用盲肠结扎穿孔术制备雄性SD大鼠脓毒症模型(80只),设正常对照组(16只)、假手术组(80只).于制模后即刻、6、12、18 h及1、2、3、7 d各组取9只大鼠,动态观察外周血单个核细胞(PBMCs)中cEPCs数(流式细胞学法)及血中肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)、白细胞介素-10(IL-10)、D-二聚体[酶联免疫吸附法(ELISA)]和抗凝血酶-Ⅲ(AT-Ⅲ,免疫浊度法)水平,肝、肾、肺组织湿/干重(W/D)比值.制模后1 d各组取8只大鼠,观察肝、肾、肺组织病理学变化及损伤评分.结果 制模后脓毒症大鼠cEPCs数量明显升高,于18 h达高峰[(7 161.9±689.8)个/106 PBMCs];血中TNF-α、IL-10、D-二聚体、AT-Ⅲ升高,分别于制模后12 h、12 h、3 d、18 h达峰值[(51.3±6.8) ng/L、(77.9±8.6) ng/L、(93.5±11.5) mg/L、(193.8±43.0) mg/L];肝、肾、肺W/D比值和组织损伤评分增加[18 h W/D比值:肝3.79±0.09,肾4.25±0.08,肺4.91±0.09;1 d组织损伤评分(分):肝1.86±0.26,肾5.14±0.34,肺6.57±0.37].模型组上述各指标均显著高于同期假手术组[18 h cEPCs数量(2 235.5±472.7)个/106 PBMCs,12 h TNF-α (14.3±5.8) ng/L,12 h IL-10 (35.0±5.8) ng/L,3 d D-二聚体(14.2±4.4) mg/L,18 h AT-Ⅲ (100.1±12.8) mg/L;18 h W/D比值:肝3.50±0.07,肾3.96±0.04,肺4.54±0.14;1 d组织损伤评分(分):肝0.29±0.18,肾0.57±0.20,肺1.14±0.51,P〈0.05或P〈0.01].相关分析显示,cEPCs数量与TNF-α(r=0.587)、IL-10(r=0.497)、D-二聚体(r=0.294)、AT-Ⅲ(r=0.690)及肝、肾、肺W/D比值(r1=0.532、r2=0.532、r3=0.679)均呈正相关(均P<0.01).结论 脓毒症时cEPCs数量明显升高,其变化与炎症反应、凝血激活、毛细血管渗漏和组织损伤程度呈正相关.提示cEPCs数量增加是机体对脓毒症的反应,且数量变化可能代表炎症反应和内皮与组织损伤的程度. Objective To observe the change in number of circulating endothelial progenitor cells (cEPCs) and analyze its significance in septic rat. Methods Septic model of male Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats was reproduced by cecum ligation and puncture (n=80), and the normal control group (n=16) and sham operation group (n=80) were established. Nine rats in each group were used, and the cEPCs numbers in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs, by flow cytometry), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-10 (IL-10), D-dimer (by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay, ELISA), antithrombase-Ⅲ (AT-Ⅲ, by immunonephelometry), wet/dry (W/D) ratio of liver, kidney and lung were determined at 0, 6, 12, 18 hours and 1, 2, 3, 7 days after reproduction of model. Eight rats in each group were used, and the pathologic changes in liver, kidney and lung at 1 day were observed, and the injury scores were evaluated. Results The cEPCs number was markedly increased, reaching the peak [(7 161.9±689.8)/106 PBMCs] at 18 hours. Circulating TNF-α, IL-10, D-dimer, AT-Ⅲ were found to be increased, and the levels reached the peak at 12 hours, 12 hours, 3 days, 18 hours, respectively [(51.3±6.8) ng/L, (77.9±8.6) ng/L, (93.5±11.5) mg/L, (193.8±43.0) mg/L]. W/D ratio was elevated and signs of injury to the liver, kidney, lung became more obvious (18-hour W/D of liver: 3.79±0.09, kidney: 4.25±0.08, lung: 4.91±0.09; 1-day tissue evaluation of liver: 1.86±0.26, kidney: 5.14±0.34, lung: 6.57±0.37). The levels of all parameters in model group were significantly higher than those in sham operation group [18-hour cEPCs numbers: (2 235.5±472.7)/106 PBMCs, 12-hour TNF-α: (14.3±5.8) ng/L, 12-hour IL-10: (35.0±5.8) ng/L, 3-day D-dimer: (14.2±4.4) mg/L, 18-hour AT-Ⅲ: (100.1±12.8) mg/L; 18-hour liver W/D ratio: 3.50±0.07, kidney: 3.96±0.04, lung: 4.54±0.14; 1-day tissue evaluation of liver: 0.29±0.18, kidney: 0.57±0.20, lung: 1.14±0.51, P〈0.05 or P〈0.01]. There was positive correlation between cEPCs numbers and TNF-α (r=0.587), IL-10 (r=0.497), D-dimer (r=0.294), AT-Ⅲ (r=0.690), and W/D ratio of liver, kidney, lung (r1=0.532, r2=0.532, r3=0.679, all P〈0.01). Conclusion The cEPCs number markedly increases in septic rats, and it shows positive correlation with the degree of inflammatory reaction, blood clotting activation, capillary leakage and tissue damage. The increase of number of cEPCs is the result of reaction to sepsis, and its change in number might be valuable in evaluating the pathogenesis of sepsis.
出处 《中国危重病急救医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第2期72-76,共5页 Chinese Critical Care Medicine
基金 基金项目:上海市教委科研项目(06BZ035)
关键词 内皮祖细胞 脓毒症 炎症反应 组织损伤 Endothelial progenitor cell Sepsis Inflammatory reaction Tissue damage
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

  • 1Schatteman GC,Dunnwald M,Jiao C.Biology of bone marrow-derived endothelial cell precursors.Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol,2007,292:H1-18.
  • 2古秀雯,刘伟,毛恩强,汤耀卿,张圣道.脓毒症患者血管内皮功能的细胞标记物检测[J].中国危重病急救医学,2009,21(1):32-35. 被引量:14
  • 3Mantovani A,Bussolino F,Introna M.Cytokine regulation of endothelial cell function:from molecular level to the bedside.Immunol Today,1997,18:231-240.
  • 4姚咏明,盛志勇.脓毒症信号转导机制的现代认识[J].中国危重病急救医学,2003,15(1):3-6. 被引量:53
  • 5Combes V,Simon AC,Grau GE,et al.In vitro generation of endothelial microparticles and possible prothrombotic activity in patients with lupus anticoagulant.J Clin Invest,1999,104:93-102.
  • 6Moldenhauer A,Nociari M,Lam G,et al.Tumor necrosis factor alpha-stimulated endothelium:an inducer of dendritic cell development from hematopoietic progenitors and myeloid leukemic cells.Stem Cells,2004,22:144-157.
  • 7Shaffer RG,Greene S,Arshi A,et al.Flow cytometric measurement of circulating endothelial cells:the effect of age and peripheral arterial disease on baseline levels of mature and progenitor populations.Cytometry B Clin Cytom,2006,70:56-62.
  • 8Vapaatalo H,Mervaala E.Clinically important factors influencing endothelial function.Med Sci Monit,2001,7:1075-1085.
  • 9Goukassian DA,Qin G,Dolan C,et al.Tumor necrosis factor-alpha receptor p75 is required in ischemia-induced neovascularization.Circulation,2007,115:752-762.
  • 10Erdbruegger U,Haubitz M,Woywodt A.Circulating endothe-lial cells:a novel marker of endothelial damage.Clin Chim Acta,2006,373:17-26.

二级参考文献26

  • 1姚宁,方国恩,杜成辉,赵为国.猪多器官功能障碍模型的建立[J].中华实验外科杂志,2005,22(1):108-109. 被引量:19
  • 2Munechika Enjoji,Makoto Nakamuta,Koji Yamaguchi,Satoshi Ohta,Kazuhiro Kotoh,Marie Fukushima,Masami Kuniyoshi,Tomomi Yamada,Masao Tanaka,Hajime Nawata.Clinical significance of serum levels of vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptor in biliary disease and carcinoma[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2005,11(8):1167-1171. 被引量:10
  • 3乔万海,王静,裴红红.多器官功能障碍综合征患者循环内皮细胞数量和血脂水平变化及临床意义[J].中国中西医结合急救杂志,2006,13(3):165-167. 被引量:4
  • 4Levy MM,Fink MP,Marshall JC,et al. 2001 SCCM/ESICM/ ACCP/ATS/SIS International Sepsis Definitions Conference. Crit Care Med,2003,31(4):1250-1256.
  • 5Grandel U,Grimminger F. Endothelial responses to bacterial toxins in sepsis. Crit Rev Immunol,2003,23(4):267-299.
  • 6Hunting CB, Noort WA, Zwaginga JJ. Circulating endothelial (progenitor) cells reflect the state of the endothelium:vascular injury, repair and neovascularization. Vox Sang, 2005,88 (1):1-9.
  • 7Jimenez J J, Jy W, Mauro LM,et al. Endothelial cells release phenotypically and quantitatively distinct microparticles in activation and apoptosis. Thromb Res, 2003, 109(4): 175-180.
  • 8Boehme MW,Galle P,Stremmel W. Kinetics of thrombomodulin release and endothelial cell injury by neutrophil-derived proteases and oxygen radicals. Immunology, 2002, 107 (3) : 340-349.
  • 9Ruegg C,Dormond O,Foletti A. Suppression of tumor angiogenesis through the inhibition of integrin function and signaling in endothelial cells: which side to target? Endothelium, 2002,9(3) :151-160.
  • 10Bannerman DD, Goldblum SE. Mechanisms of bacterial lipopolysaccharide-induced endothelial apoptosis. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol,2003,284(6):L899-914.

共引文献78

同被引文献43

  • 1Martin GS, Mannino DM, Eaton S, et al. The epidemiology of sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000. N Engl J Med,2003,348 ( 16): 1546-1554.
  • 2Asahara T, Murohara T, Sullivan A, et al. Isolation of putative progenitor endothelial cells for angiogenesis. Science, 1997,275 (5302): 964-967.
  • 3Hristov M, Erl W, Weber PC. Endothelial progenitor cells : mobilization, differentiation, and homing. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol,2003,23 (7): 1185-1189.
  • 4Spiel AO, Mayr FB, Leitner JM, et al. Simvastatin and rosuvastatin mobilize endothelial progenitor cells but do not prevent their acute decrease during systemic inflammation. Thromb Res,2008, 123 ( 1 ): 108-113.
  • 5Gao X, Chen W, Liang Z, et al. Autotransplantation of circulating endothelial progenitor cells protects against lipopolysaccharide- induced acute lung injury in rabbit. Int Immunopharmacol, 2011, 11 ( 10): 1584-1590.
  • 6Cohen J. The immunopathogenesis of sepsis. Nature, 2002, 420 :885-891.
  • 7Nemoto K,Sato H, Tanuma K, et al . Mesenteric lymph flow inendotoxemic guinea pigs. Lymphat Res Biol,2011,9(3) : 129-134.
  • 8Zaedi S,Jesmin S, Yamaguchi N,et al. Altered expression of en-dothelin, vascular endothelial growth factor, and its receptor inhepatic tissue in endotoxemic rat. Exp Biol Med, 2006,231 (6):1182-1186.
  • 9Seely KA,Holthoff JH,Burns ST,et al . Hemodynamic changesin the kidney in a pediatric rat model of sepsis-induced acute kid-ney injury. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol,2011,301(1) :209-217.
  • 10Langheinrich AC,Ritman EL. Quantitative imaging of microvas-cular permeability in a rat model of lipopolysaccharide-inducedsepsis: evaluation using cryostatic micro-computed tomo-graphy. Invest Radiol* 2006 ,41(8) ? 645-650.

引证文献3

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部