期刊文献+

经桡动脉冠脉介入治疗急性心肌梗死106例的临床疗效分析 被引量:5

Analysis of the Clinical Efficacy of Trans-radial Coronary Intervention for the Treatment of 106 Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction
下载PDF
导出
摘要 【目的]探讨经桡动脉冠脉介入治疗急性心肌梗死(AMI)的临床疗效及并发症。【方法】将急诊收治的106例行冠脉介入治疗的AMI患者随机分为经桡动脉组54例(A组)、经股动脉组52例(B组),比较两组临床治疗效果、手术持续时间及并发症等。【结果]A,B组手术成功率分别为94.4%;96.2%。两组比较无显著性差异(P〉0.05)。两组手术持续时间比较无显著性差异(P〉0.05)。A组术后局部并发症发生率为1.85%;明显低于B组(13.46%)。两组相比较有显著性差异(P〈0.05)。【结论】经桡动脉途径介入治疗AMI临床疗效好,且安全可靠,是一种更为可行的介入方法。 [Objective] To explore the clinical efficacy and complications of trans-radial coronary intervention for the treatment of 106 patients with acute myocardial infarction(AMI). [Methods] Totally 106 patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing trans-radial coronary intervention fron~ the emergency center were randomly divided into trans-radial group(group A, n = 54) and trans-femoral group(group B, n = 52). The clinical efficacy, the operation time and the incidence of complications were compared between two groups. [Results]The successful rate of the operation in group A and group B were 94.4% and 96.2%, respectively, but there was no significant difference between two groups( P 〉0.05). There was also no significant difference in the operation time between two groups( P 〉0.05). The incidence of regional complications in group A was 1.85% which was lower than that in group B(13.46%), and there was significant difference between two groups( P 〈0.05). [Conclusion] Trans radial coronary intervention for the treatment of AMI is effective, safe and reliable, so it is a feasible intervention method.
出处 《医学临床研究》 CAS 2011年第1期103-104,共2页 Journal of Clinical Research
关键词 心肌梗塞/治疗 桡动脉 血管成形术 经腔 经皮冠状动脉 myocardial infarction/TH radial artery angioplasty, transluminal, percutaneous coronary
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献15

  • 1李为民,李悦,盛力,薛竞宜,杨树森,周立君,刘丕栋.经桡动脉急诊冠状动脉介入治疗的安全性与可行性[J].中国介入心脏病学杂志,2006,14(3):138-140. 被引量:11
  • 2Campeau L.Percutaneous radial artery approach for coronary angiography.Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn,1989,16(1):3-7.
  • 3Saito S,Tanaka S,Hiroe Y,et al.Comparative study on transradial approach vs.transfemoral approach in primary stent implantation for patients with acute myocardial infarction:results of the test for myocardial infarction by prospective unicenter randomization for access sites (TEMPURA) trial.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv,2003,59(1):26-33.
  • 4Sunami K,Saito S,Tanaka S.Successful transradial coronary angioplasty and stenting using a self-expandable RADIUS stent to the anomalous left main coronary artery.J Invasive Cardiol,2003,15(1):46-48.
  • 5Ziakas A,Klinke P,Mildenberger R,et al.Comparison of the radial and the femoral approaches in percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction.Am J Cardiol,2003,91(5):598-600.
  • 6Louvard Y,Benamer H,Garot P,et al.Comparison of transradial and transfemoral approaches for coronary angiography and angioplasty in octogenarians (the OCTOPLUS study).Am J Cardiol,2004,94(9):1177-1180.
  • 7Cantor WJ,Puley G,Natarajan MK,et al.Radial versus femoral access for emergent percutaneous coronary intervention with adjunct glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition in acute myocardial infarction--the RADIAL-AMI pilot randomized trial.Am Heart J,2005,150(3):543-549.
  • 8Louvard Y,Lefevre T,Allain A,et al.Coronary angiongraphy through the radial or the femoral approach:the CARAFE study[J].Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent,2001,52:181-187.
  • 9CAMPEAU L.Percutaneous radial artery approach for coronary angiography[J].Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn,1989,16(1):3-7.
  • 10KIEMENEIJI F,LAARMAN G J,MELKER E D,et al.Transradial artery coronary angioplasty[J].Am Heart J,1995,129(2):1-8.

共引文献14

同被引文献38

引证文献5

二级引证文献39

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部