期刊文献+

语言任意性和理据性深层关系探析 被引量:2

An Exploration on the Deep Interrelationship between Linguistic Arbitrariness and Motivatedness
下载PDF
导出
摘要 当代认知语言学所揭示出的大量事实证明,语言符号除具有任意性外,背后还隐藏着深刻的理据性。这一结论也与中西两大语言研究范式相契合。索绪尔从共时角度对以希腊字母为原型的印欧语研究揭示了语言的任意性原则,中国的语言学家从历时角度对汉语的研究明确了语言的理据性原则。任意性与理据性之间的深层关系决定了任意性研究中尚存在着许多问题。对这些问题的探讨不仅有助于纠正人们对语言理据学这门新学科的一些误解,而且更有利于深化对语言任意性研究这一重大问题的认知。 Numerous facts have proved that language is both arbitrary and motivated. This conclusion is compatible with the two paradigms in linguistic studies. Saussure emphasizes the principle of arbitrariness while Chinese linguists stress the principle of motivatedness. The deep interrelationship between arbitrariness and motivatedness causes many issues. The discussion on these issues can not only clear the misunderstandings in the theory of linguistic motivatedness, but also deepen the perception of linguistic arbitrariness.
作者 李二占 王砚
出处 《天津外国语学院学报》 2011年第1期15-21,共7页 Journal Of Tianjin Foreign Studies University
基金 江苏省教育厅高校哲学社会科学基金项目(08SJB7400008)
关键词 语言符号 任意性 理据性 the linguistic sign arbitrariness motivatedness
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Bouissac, P. lconicity or Ieonization? Probing the Dynamie Interface between Language and Perceplion[A]. In C. Maeder, O. Fischer & W. J. Herlofsky(eds.) Outside-in Inside-out: Iconicity in Language and Literature 4[C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2005.15-37.
  • 2Brdar-Szabo, R. & M. Brdar. Predicative Adjectives and Grammatical-Relational Polysemy: The Role of Metonymic Processes in Motivating Cross-linguistic Differences[A]. In. G. Radden & K.-U. Panther(eds.) Studies in Linguistic Motivation[C]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2004. 321-355.
  • 3Halliday, M. A. K. ldeas, a about Language [A]. In. J. J. Webster(ed.) On Language and Linguistics[C]. Beijing: Peking University Press, 2007. 101.
  • 4Joseph, J. E. The Linguistic Sign[A]. In C. Sanders (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Saussure[C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.59-75.
  • 5Lakoff, G. & M. Johnson. Philosophy in the Flesh." The Embodied Mind and lts Challenge to Western Thought[M]. New York: Basic Books, 1999.
  • 6Newmeyer, F. J. Language Form and Language Function[M]. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1998.
  • 7de Saussure, F. Writings in General Linguistics [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
  • 8德里达.论文字学[M].汪堂家,译.上海:上海译文出版社,1999.
  • 9李二占.语言的任意性和理据性理论[J].西华大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2010,29(1):73-78. 被引量:1
  • 10李二占.语言理据研究中的几个理论问题[J].大连大学学报,2010,31(2):70-74. 被引量:1

二级参考文献68

共引文献510

同被引文献19

  • 1范文芳,汪明杰.对索绪尔有关语言符号任意性的再思考[J].外语教学,2002,23(3):3-7. 被引量:33
  • 2郭鸿.索绪尔的语言符号任意性原则是否成立?——与王寅教授商榷[J].外语研究,2001,18(1):43-47. 被引量:52
  • 3黎千驹.现代六书学研究综述[J].湖南文理学院学报(社会科学版),2007,32(2):127-131. 被引量:4
  • 4索绪尔.普通语言学教程[M].高名凯译,北京:商务印书馆,1980.
  • 5Bussmann,H. Routledge Dictionary of Language andLinguistics [M]. BeiJing:BeiJing Foreign Language Teaching andResearch Press, 2000.
  • 6Saussure,F.de.Coursein General Linguistics[M]. Translated byHarris. BeiJing:Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press,2001.
  • 7Halliday M A K. On Language and Linguistics[ M ]. Beijing: Peking University Press ,2007.
  • 8Saussure F D. Course in General Linguistics[ M ]. New York:Philosophical Library, 1959.
  • 9Panther K-U, Radden G. Introduction: Reflections on motivation revisited [ C ]//Panther K-U, Radden G. Motivation in Grammar and the Lexicon. Amsterdam:John Benjamins Publishing Company,2011:1-26.
  • 10Richards J C, et al. Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics [ M ]. 4th ed. London: Longman ( Pearson Education) ,2010.

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部