期刊文献+

基于激进构式语法的语言对比研究——英汉语言比较研究的一个新思路 被引量:4

Language Contrast Studies Based on Radical Construction Grammar——A New Perspective for Chinese-English Contrast Studies
下载PDF
导出
摘要 现代语法理论缺少描述人类语言多样性的统一理论框架和模式。以往基于现代语法理论的语言对比研究存在不足,William Croft为解释人类语言多样性提出的激进构式语法理论为语言对比研究提供了一种可行的理论框架模式。基于激进构式语法进行语言对比研究的优越性包括:模式统一简单,有利于拓展语言对比研究的广度和提高语言对比研究的深度,有利于进行科学合理的语言对比研究;激进构式语法应用于语言对比研究在理论和应用层面有其独有的优势和广阔的前景。 The modern grammatical theories lack a unified theoretical frame work and pattern in describing the diversity of human languages. The language contrast studies based on modern grammatical theories were insufficient. To solve the problem, William Croft proposed the Radical Construction Grammar to explain the diversity of human languages, thus offering a feasible theoretical frame work and pattern for language contrast studies. The advantages of applying Radical Construction Grammar to language contrast studies are discussed as being a simple and unified pattern to conduct scientific and reasonable language contrast studies substantially and extensively. Applying Radical Construction Grammar to language contrast studies has its own unique advantages and great potential in both theory and in practice.
作者 张丽杰
出处 《东北大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第1期74-78,共5页 Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science)
关键词 构式语法 激进构式语法 认知语言学 语言对比 construction grammar radical construction grammar cognitive linguistics language contrast
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Fisiak J.Theoretical Issues in Contrastive Linguistics[M].Amsterdam:John Benjamins,1980:28.
  • 2潘文国.语言对比·语言特点·语言教学[J].云南师范大学学报(对外汉语教学与研究版),2006,4(1):1-5. 被引量:9
  • 3吕叔湘.通过对比研究语法[J].语言教学与研究,1992(2):4-18. 被引量:190
  • 4Croft W,Cruse A D.Cognitive Linguistics[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2004:266-290.
  • 5刘国辉.构式语法的“构式”之辩[J].外语与外语教学,2007(8):1-5. 被引量:53
  • 6王寅.认知语言学[M].上海:上海外语教育出版社,2006:529-530.
  • 7Croft W.Radical Construction Grammar:Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective[M].Oxford:Oxford University Press,2001.
  • 8Lakoff G,Johnson M.Philosophy in the Flesh-The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought[M].New York:Basic Books,1999.
  • 9Bussmann H.Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics[M].London:Routledge,1996:80.
  • 10Croft W.Typology and Universals[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2002:282.

二级参考文献21

共引文献452

同被引文献54

引证文献4

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部