期刊文献+

“请求”行为的事件域认知模型解读 被引量:3

Interpretation of Request in Event-Domain Cognitive Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 请求的研究,往往涉及到交际中的很多问题,如礼貌问题、交际双方的面子需求、请求策略、应对策略、会话结构以及请求行为中外差异的比较等等。本文试图使用事件域认知模型理论,对请求行为及其伴随的各种情况给以一个统一的解释。对于请求行为本身来说,可以看作是请求事件的一个突显要素,而整个请求事件各个要素呈现一种层级性分布,各个要素之间、要素与整体之间、显性与隐性要素之间存在着目的性、互动性、连贯性、关联性、动态性等多种特性。这些特征为说话人选择话语形式和交际策略提供了多种可能。 Study of request always touches upon many problems in communication such as politeness,face wants of the participants,request and response strategy,conversational structure,and the difference of the request etc.The paper attempts to give an overall interpretation on the request action and the concomitant conditions from the perspective of event register in an Event-Domain Cognitive Model theory.The request act can be viewed as one of the salient elements of the entity.Different elements in the whole request action are distributed with multi-levels.Many possibilities for the conversational form and communicative strategies,many traits,such as purposive,interactional,coherent,relevant,and dynamic,exist among different elements.
作者 郜峰
出处 《学术界》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第1期154-158,287,共5页 Academics
关键词 请求 事件域认知模型 特征 个案分析 request Event-Domain Cognitive Model main traits
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1王寅.事件域认知模型及其解释力[J].现代外语,2005,28(1):17-26. 被引量:148
  • 2李旭霞.英语请求语篇的认知分析[J].解放军外国语学院学报,1999,22(4):60-62. 被引量:2
  • 3布龙菲尔德.《语言论》.袁家骅,赵世开,甘世福译.北京:商务印书馆,1997年.第2页.
  • 4赵晓东 孙亚.《(红楼梦)中请求语的语用分析》[J].外国语言文学研究,2006,(3):37-37.
  • 5阿自然、冉永平.《新编语用学概论》,北京:北京大学出版社,2009年,第224页.

二级参考文献15

  • 1谭达人.略论反义相成词[J].语文研究,1989(1):27-33. 被引量:23
  • 2杨善华.当代两方社会学理论[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1999..
  • 3Cook, G. 1994. Discourse and Literature [M]. OUP.
  • 4Garfinkel, H. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology [M]. Englewood Cliffs.
  • 5Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things:What Categories Reveal about the Mind[M ]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • 6Langacker, R, W. 1991/2002. Concept, Image and Symbol : The Cognitive Basis of Grammar [M]. Berlin : Mouton de Gruyter.
  • 7Langacker, R, W. 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. Ⅱ. Descriptive Application [ M ]. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
  • 8Panther, KU. & L. Thornburg. 1999. The potentiality for actuality metonymy in English and Hungarian [A]. In Panther, KU. & G.Radden (eds.), Metonymy in Language and Thought [C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamin.
  • 9Rice, S. 1996. Propositional prototypes[A]. In Putz, M. & R. Dirven (eds.), The Construal of Space in Language and Thought [C].Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • 10Schank, R. C. & R. P. Abelson. 1977. Scripts, plans, and knowledge [AI. In Johnson-Laird, P. N. &P. C. Wason (eds.), Thinking: Readings in Cognitive Science. Proceedings of the Fourth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence Tbilisi, USSR [C]. CUP.

共引文献148

同被引文献25

引证文献3

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部