期刊文献+

政治转型中行为者策略互动分析

Strategy Analysis on Actors' Interction in Political Transformation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 更为形式化定量的动态博弈树方法可以对政治转型中的行为者--政府与反对派策略互动展开分析。考虑两种政府的价值偏好,一种是当现政府谋求永远执政地位时与反对派策略互动方式,二是当现政府并不谋求永久执政,而谋求定期执政时与反对派策略互动方式,进而讨论分析这两种目标所带来的转型路径的差异,弥补现有行为者方法的诸多不足,得出了一些有价值的结论。 The dynamic game tree method is a more formalized quantitative analysis approach for actors of strategic interaction game in political transformation between the government and the opposition. Two transformation targets, that is, the value preferences of the government were explored : one is the interactive game pattern when the government authorities buck for the permanent governance; the other is the interactive game pattern when the government administration strives for the short term interest instead of the eternal reign. Subsequently, differences of transformation paths brought about by the two different target were expounded, to offset the deficiency of the approach of actors. Ultimately, a number of valuable conclusions were reached.
出处 《上海交通大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第1期13-19,共7页 Journal of Shanghai Jiao tong University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
基金 教育部人文社科基金青年项目"中国意识形态转型进程的测度研究"(10YJC810005)
关键词 政治转型 行为者方法 政府 反对派 策略互动 political transformation, the approach of actors, the government, the opposition,strategic interaction
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献47

  • 1郭定平.论新加坡政党与政治发展[J].政治学研究,1996(1):90-96. 被引量:9
  • 2吴清.转轨政治学:理论、方法与问题[J].政治学研究,1995(1):85-89. 被引量:11
  • 3Thomas Carothers, "The End of the Transition Paradigm", JournalofDemocracy, Vol. 13, No. 1, 2002, pp. 5-21.
  • 4David Collier and Steven Levitsky, "Democracy with Adjectives: Conceptual Innovation in Comparative Research", World Politics, Vol. 49, No. 3, 2002, pp. 430-451.
  • 5[美]亨廷顿.《第三波-20世纪后期的民主化浪潮》,刘军宁译,北京,生活·读书·新知三联书店,1998.
  • 6Daniel Levine, Paradigm Lost: From Dependency to Democracy, World Politics , Vol. 40, No. 2, 1988, p. 378.
  • 7Juan Linz and Alfred Stepan, Political Crafting and Democratic Consolidation or Destruction: European and South American Comparisons, in Robert A. Pastor, ed. , Democracy in Americas: Stopping the Pendulum, New York: Holmes and Meier, 1989, p. 41.
  • 8Doh Chull Shin, On the Third Wave of Democratization: a Synthesis and Evaluation of Recent Theory and Research, Worm Politics, Vol. 47, No. 1, 1994, pp. 138-161.
  • 9Dankwart A. Rostow, Transition to Democracy: Toward a Dynamic Model, Comparative Politics, Vol. 2, No. 3, 1970, pp. 350-360.
  • 10Guillermo A. O' Donnell and Philippe C. Schmitter, Transition from Authoritarian Rule : Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986, pp. 3-5.

共引文献57

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部