交通瞬间违法行为的证据认定及适用规则(上)——从行政法的经济分析维度

Evidence Identification of Traffic Instant Offence and Its Applicable Principles(the first half)——In the view of economic analysis of Administrative Law

近年来,交通处罚行政复议案件呈上升趋势。其中突出的一个方面就是对民警处罚证据规格和效力的质疑,特别是对于诸如闯红灯、变道行驶等瞬间违法行为,只有执勤交警陈述而被处罚人对违法事实予以否认的所谓的"一对一"证据情况。作者结合自身从事行政复议工作的实践,对交通瞬间违法行为处罚的证据规则问题提出了自己新的见解和认识,并对如何进一步建设和完善交通瞬间违法行为的证据规则,预防和减少当事人的不满和投诉,维护正常有序的交通运行秩序,维护社会和谐稳定提出了自己的看法。

In recent years, there is an increasing tendency of traffic adnfinistrative reconsideration cases. The salient one is the doubt to the specification and effectiveness of police for the penalty, such as lights jumping, lane change driving and other instant offence in particular, the situation of the statement of policeman only and the denial of the person who is published. The author put forward own ideas on evidence rules of penalty to traffic instant offence and own opinions on how to construct and perfect evidence rules of penalty to traffic instant offence, prevent and reduce the client＇ s dissatisfaction and complaints, keep the normal and orderly traffic order and maintain social harmony and stability with the practice on administrative reconsideration.