期刊文献+

CSCL中基于数据挖掘的角色分析研究 被引量:3

Data Mining-Based Role Analysis in CSCL
下载PDF
导出
摘要 尽管计算机支持的协作学习(CSCL)在理论研究领域和教育实践领域已经取得很大的进展,但协作学习过程中学习者所扮演的角色、所处的地位和特征还不明确。以往在用户角色研究领域大都采用社会网络分析方法,先假设多种类型的用户角色再进行验证。这种方法依赖于主观经验,忽略言论内容本身,导致角色种类有所限制。以"信息技术与教育"和"E-Learning导论"在线课程异步讨论区中的交互言论作为研究对象,通过数据挖掘方法来分析CSCL中的用户角色,发现:在线协作学习过程中一般存在着咨询者、参与讨论者、创新者、贡献者和论证者5种用户角色,但是不同的协作任务中,用户角色种类也有其差异性。数据挖掘有助于帮助研究者发现在线交互的特点。 Although much theoretical and practical progress has been made in Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL), the role, position and characteristics of collaborative learners are still not clearly defined. Social network analysis method, which assumes and verifies various kinds of user's roles, is widely applied in user' role research. This method relies too much on subjective experience, but neglects the actual content, and limits role types. A study is made on the contents in discussion forums of the two courses of Information Technology and Education, and Guide to E-Learning, and the data mining method is applied to analyze CSCL user's roles. It is revealed that there are five user roles in CSCL: the question raiser, the discussion participant, the innovator, the contributor and the demonstrator, though difference in role types exists in different collaborative tasks. Data mining can help researchers discover characteristics of online interaction.
作者 陈鹏 李艳燕
出处 《现代远程教育研究》 CSSCI 2011年第1期84-88,共5页 Modern Distance Education Research
基金 国家自然科学基金资助(项目批准号:60705023)
关键词 角色分析 数据挖掘 用户角色 CSCL Role Analysis Data Mining User's Role CSCL
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献42

  • 1杨永斌.数据挖掘技术在证券业中的应用[J].重庆工商大学学报(自然科学版),2005,22(5):461-463. 被引量:2
  • 2[2]李克东(2003).教育技术学研究方法[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,2003.
  • 3[3]朱伶俐(2006).在线学习中交互文本编码体系的设计及其应用研究[D].北京师范大学硕士学位论文,2006.
  • 4[4]Hakkinen,P.,Jarvela,S.,& Makitalo,K.(2003).Sharing perspective in virtual interaction:Review of methods of analysis[A],In B.Wasson,S.Ludvigsen & U.Hoppe (Eds.),Designing for Change in Networked Learning Environments,proceedings of the International Conference on Computer-support for Collaborative Learning[C],Dordrecht:Kluwer,2003,395 -404,
  • 5[5]Gruber T.R.(1993).A translation approach to portable ontology specifications.Knowledge Acquisition,1993,(5),199-220.
  • 6[6]Liao,J.,Li,Y.,et al.(2006).Computer-Supported Content Analysis for Collaborative Knowledge Building in CSCL[A],proceedings of the International Conference on Computer-support for Collaborative Learning[C].
  • 7[7]Lowe,W.(2007).Software for content analysis-a review,retrieved February 12,2007,from http://people.iq.harvard.edu/~wlowe/Publications/rev.pdf.
  • 8[8]Miles,M.B.& Huberman,A.M.(1994).Qualitative Data Analysis:An Expanded Sourcebook[M].California:Sage Publications,1994.
  • 9[9]Nurmela,K.,Palonen,T.,Lehtine,E.& Hakkarinen,K.(2003).Developing tools for analyzing CSCL process[A],proceedings of the International Conference on Computer-support for Collaborative Learning[C],Bergen,Norway,2003,333-342.
  • 10[10]Rummel,N.& Spada,H.(2004).Cracking the nut-but which nutcracker to use? Diversity in approaches to analyzing collaborative processes in technology-supported settings[A].proceedings of the 6th International Conference of the Learning Sciences[C],UCLA,Santa Monica,2004,pp.23-26.

共引文献141

同被引文献65

引证文献3

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部