摘要
2009年9月至12月采用随机的方法,从144名中国医科大学本科生中选取72名学生,在对本科生进行全科医学教学基础上对其开展第二课堂教学作为补充,教学活动结束后采取考试、调查问卷和座谈的方式评价教学效果.参加与未参加第二课堂教学的学生期末总成绩相似,但病例分析题与论文作业成绩高于未参加者[分别为（7.4±2.1）与（6.7±1.8）分、（16±4）与（15±4）分],差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05,＜0.01）.各项活动满意度均在88%以上。
One hundred and forty-four medical students were enrolled in the study, the participants were randomly divided into experimental group and control group with 72 in each. All students attended the theoretical lecture of general medicine. Students in experimental group took part in the extracurricular teaching activities including the nutritional course and practice, the clinical case study and problem based learning （ PBL）, students in control group did not have the extracurricular activities. The results showed that although there was no difference in general testing scores between two groups, the problem solving ability and assay-writing ability of experimental group were significantly higher than those of control group.
出处
《中华全科医师杂志》
2011年第1期43-44,共2页
Chinese Journal of General Practitioners
关键词
家庭医学
教育
医学
本科
Family practice
Education, medical,undergraduate
