期刊文献+

论国际法的财产权逻辑 被引量:6

On the Logic of Property Rights Underlying International Law
原文传递
导出
摘要 财产权与主权的关系、财产权与国际和平及发展的关系、全球化背景下国际法实践的基本趋势,以及财产权内涵的确定性都表明,在理解国际法方面,财产权逻辑可以构成传统主权逻辑之外的另一进路。迄今为止,国际法的财产权逻辑在权利主体、规制标准以及保护手段方面发生了重要变化,而在财产权观念方面并未发生明显变化,这对于以往以及未来的国际和平与发展都具有重要的影响。财产权逻辑的进路促使人们认识到国际法实践在主权之外还存在着或许更为绵长的动力,即财产权,从而有助于国际社会借鉴国内成熟的财产权法律经验,以国际法基本宗旨为基本依据,解构并重构现行国际法财产权逻辑,以切实实现并长期维护国际和平与发展,进而推动国际法治。 The relationship between property rights and sovereignty,property rights and international peace and development,fundamental trend of international law in the globalization,and the certainty of the meaning of property rights devise the property rights another approach to understanding international law besides the sovereignty approach.Up to date,the logic of property rights underlying international law have undergone great changes in terms of subjects of rights,criteria of regulation,and the means of protecting property rights,while the ideology of property rights has hardly changed,which have important implications towards international peace and security before and in the future.The approach of logic of property rights makes people realize the existence of another dynamic of international law besides sovereignty and the former may be more fundamental than the latter.With this approach,the international community may deconstruct and reconstruct the logic of property rights of international law drawing on national legal practice in property rights with the aim to effectively realizing and maintaining international peace and security and to promoting international rule of law.
作者 蔡从燕
机构地区 厦门大学法学院
出处 《法律科学(西北政法大学学报)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第1期71-83,共13页 Science of Law:Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
基金 国家社会科学基金青年项目<国际法上的类比研究>(编号08CFX052) 2009年教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划研究成果
关键词 国际法 财产权 国际和平与安全 发展 international law property rights international peace and security development
  • 相关文献

参考文献80

  • 1Ulrich Beck, World Risk Society, Polity Press, 1999.
  • 2Henry R. Hertzfeld and Frans G. vonder Dunk, Issues in Space Law: Bring Space Law into the Commercial World: Property Rights without Sovereignty, 6 Chi. J. Int'l L. 8,2005.
  • 3Kemal Baslar, The Concept of the Common Heritage of Mankind in International Law, Maritinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1998.
  • 4Theodor Meron, The Humanization of International Law, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2006.
  • 5Report of the High - level Panel on Threats, Challenges and Change, A More Secure World : Our Shared Responsibility, United Nations, 2004.
  • 6William Edward Hall, A Treatise on International Law(5th edition), Clarendon Press, 1904.
  • 7[德]塞缪尔·普芬道夫.人和公民的自然法义务[M].鞠成伟,译.北京:商务印书馆,2009.
  • 8R. G. Hawtrey, Economic Aspect of Sovereignty, Longmans, Gree and Co. , 1930.
  • 9Kurt Burch, "Property" and the Making of the International System, Lynne Rienner Publisher, 1998.
  • 10H. Lauterpacht, Private Law Sources and Analogies of International Law, Longmans, Green and Co. LTD, 1927.

二级参考文献35

  • 1徐国栋.诚实信用原则二题[J].法学研究,2002,24(4):74-88. 被引量:114
  • 2余劲松.外资的公平与公正待遇问题研究——由NAFTA的实践产生的几点思考[J].法商研究,2005,22(6):41-48. 被引量:37
  • 3S. Hindelang. Bilateral Investment Treaties, Custom and a Healthy Investment Climate--The Question of Whether BITs Influence Customary International Law Revisited [ J ]. The Journal of World Investment & Trade, Vol. 5, 2004.
  • 4M. C. Porterfield. San International Common Law of Investor Rights? [J]. University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law, Vol. 27, 2006.
  • 5H. M. Franck. The Power of Legitimacy among Nations [ M]. Oxford University Press, 1990.
  • 6C. Schreuer. Decisions Ex Aequo et Bono under the ICSID Convention [ J ]. ICSID Review--Foreign Investment Law Journal, Vol. 11, 1996.
  • 7V. Lowe. Changing Dimensions of International Investment Law, Lecture 4--Fair and Equitable Treatment [ Z ] , Summer Programme of Xiamen Academy of International Law, 2006.
  • 8T. J. Westcott. Recent Practice on Fair and Equitable Treatment [ J]. The Journal of World Investment & Trade, Vol. 8, 2007.
  • 9P. Kelly. The Twilight of Customary International Law [ J ]. Virginia Journal of International Law, Vol. 40, 2000.
  • 10C. Schreuer. Fair and Equitable Treatment in Arbitral Practice [ J ]. The Journal of World Investment & Trade, Vol. 6, 2005.

共引文献2018

同被引文献128

引证文献6

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部