期刊文献+

罗氏COBAS6000全自动电化学发光免疫分析仪性能验证 被引量:9

Performance verification of Roche COBAS 6000 automatic electrochemiluminescence immunoassay analyzer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的按ISO15189要求对罗氏COBAS 6000全自动电化学发光免疫分析仪的性能进行验证。方法对甲胎蛋白(alpha-fetoprotein,AFP)的精密度、准确度、临床可报告范围(clinical reportable range,CRR)、分析测量范围(analytical measurement range,AMR)、参考区间进行验证实验。结果批内精密度变异系数(coefficient variation,CV)高低值分别为3.28%和3.46%;日间精密度CV高低值分别为4.39%和5.13%,均小于厂家提供的CV(10%)。相对偏差为0.862%,小于5%。分析测量范围为0.80-1 200 ng/ml,参考区间为0-20.00 ng/ml,临床可报告范围为0-60 000 ng/ml。结论罗氏COBAS 6000全自动电化学发光免疫分析仪的性能与厂家提供的资料基本一致,故可用其进行临床标本的检验工作,所得结果具有可信性。 Objective To test and verify the system performance of Roche COBAS 6000 automatic electrochemiluminescence immunoassay analyzer according to the requirements of ISO15189.Methods Verification experiments were taken to measure the precision,accuracy,clinical reportable range(CRR),analytical measurement range(AMR),reference interval of alpha-fetoprotein(AFP).Results The high and low values of coefficient variation(CV)of inter-assay were 3.28% and 3.46%,and those of between-day precision were 4.39% and 5.13%,which were all less than the CV provided by the manufacturer(10%).Relative bias was 0.862%.Analytical measurement range was 0.80-1 200 ng/ml,the reference interval was 0-20.00 ng/ml,and the clinical reportable range was 0-60 000 ng/ml.Conclusion The basic performances of Roche COBAS6000 automatic electrochemiluminescence immunoassay analyzer are consistent with the data provided by the manufacturer,so it can be used to inspect the clinical samples and the results are credible.
作者 谭晓辉 王勇
出处 《山西医科大学学报》 CAS 2011年第1期52-55,共4页 Journal of Shanxi Medical University
关键词 罗氏COBAS 6000全自动电化学发光免疫分析仪 甲胎蛋白 性能验证 Roche COBAS6000 automatic electrochemiluminescence immunoassay analyzer alpha-fetoprotein performance verification
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献18

  • 1陈灏珠.实用内科学[M](第10版)[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1998.2076-2077.
  • 2Department of Health and Human Services,Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.Clinical laboratory improvement amendments of 1988:final rule.Fed Register,2003:3704.
  • 3NCCLS.EP10-A Preliminary evaluation of quantitative clinical laboratory methods.Wayne PA:National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards,1998.
  • 4Spencer CA.Thyroid profiling for the 1990s:free T4 estimate or sensitive TSH measurement.J Clin Immunoassay,1989,12:82-89.
  • 5NCCLS.EP6-P2 Evaluation of linearity of quantitative analytical methods.Proposed guideline-second edition,2002.21-20.
  • 6NCCLS.C28-A2 How to define and determine reference intervals in the clinical laboratory; approved guideline.Wayne PA:NCCLS,2000.
  • 7NCCLS.EP9-A Method comparison and bias estimation using patient samples.Wayne PA:National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards,1995.
  • 8College of American Pathologists. Clinical Immunotogy Checklist [S]. 2006.
  • 9National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standands. Evaluation of precision performance of clinical chemistry devices[ S]. EPS-A. Wayne, PA : NCCLS, 1999.
  • 10National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standands. Evaluation of linearity of quantitative analytical methods[S]. EP6-92. Proposed guideline, 2nd ed. NCCLS.

共引文献188

同被引文献73

引证文献9

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部