期刊文献+

中国生态伦理传统与现代西方环境伦理学思维方式之比较 被引量:3

Comparison of Thinking Ways between China's Eco-Ethic Traditions and Modern Western Environmental Ethics
下载PDF
导出
摘要 特殊的地理环境与语言形式规定了中国整体直觉的思维方式与西方严密分析的理性思维方式的基本差异。中国在长期的农业文明时代形成生态伦理传统中的过程性思维、事实与价值一体性思维、矛盾和谐论的辩证思维偏向;而西方在全球生态危机情势下对环境伦理学的探索中,也形成自组织思维,生态价值思维及人与自然在竞争中实现生态和谐的思维特征。这两种思维方式既具有一致性和互补性,也具有差异性。中国生态伦理学的未来发展应该以自身的思维方式为根基,同时也要借鉴西方环境伦理学中思维方式的合理因素。 This article holds that particular geographical environments and languages lead to the difference between the China's overall and intuitive ways of thinking on one hand and the Western rigorous analyzing and rational ways of thinking on the other hand.The long-term agricultural civilization has formed in Chinese eco-ethic traditions a way of process thinking,a fact-value integrative way of thinking,and a dialectical way of thinking on contradictions and harmonies,while in inquiry about the global ecological crisis,the Western environmental ethics has produced the self-organizing thinking,the ecological value thinking and the thinking of realizing harmony between nature and man through competition.In these two ways of thinking there are consistencies,complementarities and differences.The future development of China's eco-ethics should be based on its own way of thinking as a root and draw lessons from the ways of thinking in the Western environmental ethics.
作者 佘正荣
出处 《鄱阳湖学刊》 2011年第1期95-103,共9页 Journal of Poyang Lake
关键词 思维方式 中国生态伦理传统 现代西方环境伦理学 thinking ways China's eco-ethic traditions modern Western environmental ethics
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1王树人,喻柏林.论“象”与“象思维”[J].中国社会科学,1998(4):38-48. 被引量:91
  • 2[美]詹奇.自组织的宇宙观[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1992..
  • 3[美]E·拉兹洛.1988.进化--广义综合理论[M] 闵家胤,译.北京:社会科学文献出版社.

共引文献93

同被引文献59

引证文献3

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部