期刊文献+

世界卫生组织生存质量老年人量表简化版的研制 被引量:39

Development of a Short Form of WHOQOL-OLD
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:研制WHOQOL-OLD量表的简化版,并考察该简表的信效度。方法:在WHOQOL-OLD国际合作组提供的5566名老年人样本资料中,随机抽取2/3作为训练样本,1/3为考核样本。用经典测量理论和项目反应理论的方法对训练样本进行条目筛选,并用考核样本评价简表的信度和效度。结果:每个领域保留2个较优的条目,形成了12个条目的简明量表WHOQOL-OLD-12。简表各领域的平均信息量仅减少了22.1%~32.9%;简表的克朗巴赫系数为0.80;各领域与WHOQOL-BREF各领域及总分的相关系数介于0.21~0.76之间,大部分大于0.40。结论:WHOQOL-OLD简明量表具有可接受的信度和效度,是老年人生存质量研究中简单易行的测量工具。 Objective:To develop a short form of questionnaire WHOQOL-OLD,and evaluate its reliability and validity.Methods:From a sample of 5566 old adults provided by the research team of WHOQOL-OLD,2/3 of them were randomly selected and used as a training sample,and the remaining 1/3 as a validation sample.The methods of classical test theory and item response theory were used to select the better items in the training sample.And the validation sample was used to evaluate the reliability and validity of the short form scale.Results:2 better items remained within each domain of the original WHOQOL-OLD scale,a short form WHOQOL-OLD-12 was formed.The average amount of t of the six domains of short form scale was reduced from 22.1% to 32.9% only;the Cronbach'α of the short form was 0.8;and the correlation coefficients between the domains of WHOQOL-OLD-12 and WHOQOL-BREF ranged from 0.21 to 0.76,most of them were greater than 0.4,which showed better criterion validity.Conclusion:With acceptable reliability and validity,WHOQOL-OLD-12 is a refined instrument for the quality of life of older adults.
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 2011年第1期27-30,34,共5页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
关键词 条目反应理论 WHOQOL-OLD 简表 老年人 生存质量 Item response theory WHOQOL-OLD Short form scale Older adults Quality of life
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1United Nations. World population prospects: the 2008 revision. New York: United Nations Population Division, 2009. http: //www. un.org/ esa/ population/ publications/wpp2008/ pressrelease.pdf.
  • 2Power M, Quinn K, Schmidt S, WHOQOL-OLD Group. Development of the WHOQOL-Old module. Quality of Life Research, 2005, 14(10): 2197-2214.
  • 3Embretson SE, Reise SP. Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2002. 13-125.
  • 4杨立峰,戴海崎.IRT理论框架下不同参数模型和评分模型对能力估计的影响[J].菏泽学院学报,2007,29(2):15-18. 被引量:3
  • 5Masters GN. A rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika, 1982, 47:149-174.
  • 6Prieto L, Alonso J, Lamarca R. Classical test theory versus rasch analysis for quality of life questionnaire reduction. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2003, 1(27): 1-13.
  • 7Lai JS, Cella D, Chang CH, et al. Item banking to improve, shorten and computerize self-reported fatigue: an illustra- tion of steps to create a core item bank from the FACIT- Fatigue Scale. Quality of Life Research, 2003, 12(5): 485- 501.
  • 8Normand ST, Belanger A J, Eisen SV. Graded response mod- el-based item selection for behavior and symptom identifi- cation. Health Service Outcomes Research Methodology, 2006, 6:1-19.
  • 9孔燕,张凡.基于项目反应理论的中国公民科学素质测评方法研究[J].科技管理研究,2009,29(4):280-283. 被引量:9
  • 10Gomez R. Item response theory analyses of the parent and teacher ratings of the DSM-IV ADHD rating scale. Abnormal Child Psychology, 2008, 36(6): 865-885.

二级参考文献6

  • 1何薇.中国公众科学素养调查结果回顾[J].民主与科学,2004(5):10-13. 被引量:20
  • 2国务院关于印发全民科学素质行动计划纲要(2006-2010-2020)的通知[Z].
  • 3余嘉元.项目反映理论及其应用[M].江苏:江苏教育出版社,1992.
  • 4[1]戴海崎,丁树良,罗照盛.心理与教育统计测量专题研究文集[C].南昌:江西科学技术出版社,2005:50-57.
  • 5[4]Si C F,Randall E S.Ability Estimation Under Different Item Parameterization and Scoring Models[J].International Journal of Testing,2004,4:162.
  • 6许健,马世晔,何晓群.标准化试题的评价与IRT模型的应用[J].中国考试(下半月),2000(12):15-17. 被引量:7

共引文献182

同被引文献405

引证文献39

二级引证文献485

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部