期刊文献+

量词提升的制约条件 被引量:3

A constraint on quantifier raising
原文传递
导出
摘要 英语中包含两个或多个量词的句子通常会有两种或多种解读。在管辖与约束理论框架内,一般的解决方案是将所有量词都提升至逻辑式中相应的辖域位置,并对提升后遗留在原位的语迹进行约束而得到相应的解读。该方案存在两个问题。第一,更多的语言事实证明,量词句的歧义问题并不能单纯地依靠量词提升来解决;第二,将所有量词都提升至逻辑式中相应辖域位置的做法有违经济原则。为了解决以上两个问题,文章在经济原则的指导下对传统的量词提升做出了限制,即量词提升不得跨越另一量词提升的落点。该制约条件一方面简化了量词歧义解读的步骤,另一方面又解决了传统量词提升理论解决不了的歧义过多问题。 English sentences with two or more quantifiers may have two or more interpretations.In the framework of Government and Binding Theory,one solution is to raise the quantifiers to the respective positions,and the traces of those moved quantifiers are governed respectively.However,there are two problems.First,it has been proved that the ambiguity of many quantified sentences cannot be solved by QR.Second,raising the quantifiers violates the principle of economy.Thus,the study proposes a constraint on QR;the raising of a quantifier cannot cross the landing site of another quantifier.The constraint simplifies the interpretation of the moved quantifiers and explains the over-generation of the ambiguity which remains a problem for the traditional QR theory.
作者 余小强
机构地区 湖南大学
出处 《现代外语》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第1期12-18,108,共7页 Modern Foreign Languages
基金 国家社科基金项目(编号:08CYY030) 湖南省社科基金项目(编号:08YBB305)的部分成果 湖南省语言与认知研究基地的资助
  • 相关文献

参考文献33

  • 1Aoun, J. & Y. A. Li. 1989. Constituency and scope [J]. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 141-172.
  • 2Aoun, J. & Y. A. Li. 1993. Syntax of Scope [M]. Cambridge, MA. : The MIT Press.
  • 3Barwise, J. & R. Cooper. 1981. Generalized quantifiers and natural language [J].Linguistics and Philosophy 4: 159-219.
  • 4Beck, S. 2006. Intervention effects follow from focus interpretation [J]. Natural Language Semantics 1 : 1-56.
  • 5Bianchi, V. & M. Frascarelli. 2009. Is Topic a Root Phenomenon [R]. Universita degli Studi di Siena and Universit6 degli Studi Roma Tre.
  • 6Bruening, B. 2001. QR obeys superiority: Frozen scope and ACD EJ]. Linguistic Inquiry 32: 233- 273.
  • 7Biiring, D. 1997. The Meaning of Topic and Focus- The 59th Street Bridge Accent [M]. London: Routledge.
  • 8Chomsky, N. 1976. Conditions on rules of grammar [J]. Linguistic Analysis 2 : 303-351.
  • 9Chomsky, N. 1986. Barriers [M]. Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press.
  • 10Fox, D. 2000. Economy and Semantic Interpretation [M]. Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press.

二级参考文献121

共引文献35

同被引文献31

  • 1赵玉荣.汉语主动、被动简单句中的量词辖域释义[J].清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2004,19(S1):16-20. 被引量:1
  • 2宗守云.量词的范畴化功能及其等级序列[J].上海师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2014,43(1):120-128. 被引量:18
  • 3张连文.再谈Wh-移位中的不对称(续)[J].外语学刊,2006(1):73-78. 被引量:4
  • 4马建忠.马氏文通[M].北京:商务印书馆,2000.
  • 5张志公.语法和语法教学[M].北京:人民教育出版社.1956.
  • 6Croft, W. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar [M]. Oxford: OUP.
  • 7Goossens, L. 1990. Metaphtonymy: The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in expressions for linguistic action [J]. Cognitive Linguistics 1: 323-340.
  • 8Gregersen, T., P. Macintyre & M. Meza. 2014. The motion of emotion: Idiodynamic case studies of learners' foreign language anxiety [J]. Modern Language Journal 98: 574-588.
  • 9Hartshome, JK., A. Pogue & J. Snedeker. 2014. Love is hard to understand: The relationship between transitivity and caused events in the acquisition of emotion verbs [J]. Journal of Child Language 19: 1-38.
  • 10Hassan, A. & R. I. Damper, 2012. Classification of emotional speech using 3DEC hierarchical classifier [J]. Speech Communication 54: 903-916.

引证文献3

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部