期刊文献+

转喻词语理解的认知语用机理探究——关联理论和认知语言学的整合分析模式 被引量:18

A cognitive pragmatic study of metonymic expressions:An integrated model of relevance theory and cognitive linguistics
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文以认知语言学和关联理论在转喻研究上的互补性为理论框架,分析转喻词语理解所涉及的认知和语用因素,提出言语交际中转喻词语理解的认知语用分析模式,探讨转喻词语理解的认知语用机理。转喻理解的关键是确立喻体和本体概念之间的联系,但概念之间的联系不是固定不变的,而是在一定的语境条件下动态生成的。听话人在关联原则的制约下选择和构建语境假设,确定转喻关系,进而获取转喻词语的转指信息及其认知效果。 This paper argues for the joint work of relevance theory and cognitive linguistics for the study of metonymy,and aims to formulate a cognitive pragmatic explanation of novel metonymic uses of words in verbal communication.Metonymic relations are not rigid and pre-stored in mind to influence metonymy interpretation but constructed on line in context.Consistent with the principle of relevance,metonymic expressions can be interpreted as the reference point and the specific context,which function as contextual assumptions to construct an ad hoc concept and derive extra cognitive effects.
作者 江晓红
机构地区 肇庆学院
出处 《现代外语》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第1期34-41,109,共8页 Modern Foreign Languages
基金 广东省哲学社会科学"十一五"规划项目(编号:08GK-04)的阶段性成果
  • 相关文献

参考文献30

  • 1Barcelona, A. 2007. The role of metonymy in meaning construction at discourse level: A case study[A].In G. Radden, K-M. Kopke, T. Berg & P. Siemund (eds.). Aspects of Meaning Construction[C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 51-75.
  • 2Carston, R. 1996. Enrichment and loosening: Complementary processes in deriving the proposition expressed [J].UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 8: 1-25.
  • 3Carston, R. 2010. Metaphor: Ad hoc concepts, literal meaning and images[R]. Paper delivered to the Aristotelian Society, Senate House, London.
  • 4Cummings, L. 2005. Pragmatics : A Multidisciplinary Perspective [ M ]. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  • 5Evans, V. & M. Green. 2006. Cognitive Linguistics:An Introduction [M]. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  • 6Gibbs, R. W. & M. Tendahl. 2006. Cognitive effort and effects in metaphor comprehension: Relevance theory and psycholinguistics[J].Mind & Language 21, 3: 379-403.
  • 7Jackendoff, R. 2002. Foundations of Language : Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • 8Jing-Schmidt, Z. 2008. Much mouth much tongue: Chinese metonymies and metaphors of verbal communication [J]. Cognitive Linguistics 19, 20: 241-282.
  • 9Koch, P. 2004. Metonymy between pragmatics, reference, and diachrony [J]. Metaphorik. De 7: 6-54.
  • 10Lakoff, G. & M. Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By [ M ]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

二级参考文献93

共引文献310

同被引文献274

引证文献18

二级引证文献65

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部