期刊文献+

“有”拒斥“无”和“有”生于“无”——海德格尔论科学中“有”和“无”的问题 被引量:1

Beings Rejecting Non-being and Beings Emerging from Non-being——Heidegger on the Problem of Beings and Non-being in Science
原文传递
导出
摘要 在科学看来,应该得到研究的只是作为"有"的存在者,"无"作为"非存在"则是应该被排斥的东西,因而不愿与闻"无"。海德格尔对此予以批判,他认为,科学的这种认识是由于科学对"无"的误解造成的,科学在"无"的问题上是无能的。实际上,"无"就是存在之无化,科学恰恰是以这个"无"为基础的,在本质上归属于"无"。为了克服科学本身的缺陷及其带来的危险,必须超越"有"而进入"无",由此把握存在者整体,开辟一片新的天地。 In science's view,what would be studied is only beings which are,but Non-being which is not would be rejected,so science don't want to have a participant's knowledge of Non-being.Heidegger critisized this point.He thought that such science's cognition results from the misunderstanding about Non-being,and science is incapable of Non-being.In fact,Non-being is Being's nihilation,science is exactly based on such Non-being and belongs to Non-being.in essence.To overcome the defect of science itself and the dangers which science brings,people must transcend beings and enter Non-being.In this way,people can know beings as a whole and open up a new field.
出处 《自然辩证法研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第2期121-126,共6页 Studies in Dialectics of Nature
关键词 科学 “有” “无” science being Non-being
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1[法]彭加勒.科学与假设[M].叶蕴理,译.北京;商务印书馆,1989.
  • 2[德]海德格尔.演讲与论文集(孙周兴译)[M].北京:三联书店,2005.
  • 3[德]海德格尔.路标[M].孙周兴译.北京:商务印书馆,2001.
  • 4转引自[德]冈特·绍伊博尔德.海德格尔分析新时代的科技[M].北京:中国科学院出版社,1993.
  • 5孙周兴选编.海德格尔选集(上)[M].上海:三联书店,1996.
  • 6Heidegger. Pathmarks [M]. Edited by William McNeill, Cambridge;New York:Cambridge University Press,1998.
  • 7[德]海德格尔.形而上学导论[M].北京:商务印书馆,1996..

共引文献104

同被引文献6

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部