期刊文献+

准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术后Orbscan II估算术前角膜屈光力 被引量:2

Estimation of preoperative corneal power in patients with myopic LASIK based on postoperative corneal data measured from Orbscan II
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的比较Orbscan II测量准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)前后周边角膜后表面曲率半径改变,初步确立新的角膜前后表面曲率半径比率R,利用术后周边后表面角膜曲率半径和比率R估算术前角膜总屈光力。方法回顾分析OrbscanⅡ测量151只眼术前及术后3个月角膜7—10mm区后表面曲率半径值的变化,计算角膜0~7mm区前表面曲率半径与角膜7—10mm区后表面曲率半径比率R,利用比率R推算30只眼术前角膜总屈光力,并验证计算性角膜总屈光值与测量性角膜总屈光值的一致性。LASIK手术前后角膜7~10mm后表面曲率半径变化和计算性角膜总屈光力与术前Orbscan 1I测得角膜总屈光力比较采用配对t检验。结果LASIK术前后角膜7~10mm区后表面曲率半径差值为(-0.005±0.154)mm(t=0.417,P=0.677),术前角膜0~7mm区前表面曲率半径与角膜7-10mm区后表面曲率半径比率R为1.167±0.030,利用比率R推算的角膜总屈光力均值为(43.49±1.79)D,OrbscanⅡ测得实际角膜总屈光力均值为(43.77±1.53)D,两者差值均值为(-0.28±1.oo)D(t=-1.523,P=0.139)。结论LASIK手术前后周边区域角膜后表面曲率半径改变无实际临床意义,计算所得新角膜前后表面曲率半径比率R可准确的推算LASIK术者术前角膜总屈光力,为LASIK术后丢失术前资料患者双K法计算人工晶状体度数提供重要条件。(中华眼科杂志,2011,47:151-155) Objective Compare the change of pre- and post-operative posterior corneal curvature measurements in peripheral fitting zones using the Orbscan II topographer in patients undergoing myopic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). To establish a new ratio of the anterior and posterior corneal curvature for the calculation of preoperative total corneal power using postoperative corneal data alone in patients after LASIK. Methods Retrospectively analyzed the changes of posterior corneal curvature in peripheral 7 to 10 mm fitting zones in 151 right eyes ( 151 individuals) 3 month after LASIK as measured by Orbscan Ⅱ. The new ratio between the anterior and posterior corneal curvature was measured. The new ratio was used to estimate pre-operative total corneal refractive power in 30 eyes. The estimated total corneal refractive power was compared with the value measured from Orbscan lI preoperatively. The accuracy of intraocular lens power estimated in 2 cases underwent cataract surgery after corneal refractive surgery was studied. Results The mean difference in estimated pre- and post-operative power of the posterior cornea was ( - 0. 005± 0. 154)mm (t =0. 417, P =0. 677). The ratio between the preoperative anterior central (0-7 mm) corneal curvature and the posterior peripheral (7 to 10 mm) corneal curvature was 1. 167 +0. 030. Estimated mean pre-operative total corneal power was (43.49 ±1.79 ) D, whereas the value measuring from Orbscan 1I preoperatively was (43. 77± 1.53 )D. The mean difference between these two measurements was ( -0. 28 ± 1.00)D (t = - 1. 523, P =0. 139). The spherical equivalent refraction after cataract extraction of the two cases undertaken cataract surgery after corneal refractive surgery was 0. 54 D and 0. 69 D, respectively.Conclusions The difference in posterior corneal curvature measurement following myopic LASIK using the peripheral fitting zone with the Orbscan II, as compared to the preoperative values, is clinically insignificant. The pre-LASIK corneal power can be estimated using post-LASIK data together with the new calculated ratio. This will be useful in post-LASIK patients requiring cataract surgery but without the availability of pre-LASIK corneal data for the estimation of the intraocular lens power. (Chin J Ophthalmol, 2011,47:151-155 )
出处 《中华眼科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第2期151-155,共5页 Chinese Journal of Ophthalmology
基金 温州市对外科技合作项目(H20080030)
关键词 角膜屈光力 角膜曲率半径 ORBSCAN lI LASIK 人工晶状体度数 Corneal power Corneal curvature Orbscan II LASIK Intraocular lens power
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Aramberri J. Intraocular lens power calculation after corneal refractive surgery:double-K method. J Cataract Refract Surg,2003, 29 : 2063 -2068.
  • 2刘后仓,谢立信.角膜屈光手术后的人工晶状体度数计算[J].中华眼科杂志,2007,43(2):188-192. 被引量:1
  • 3代云海,黄钰森,谢立信.角膜屈光手术后人工晶状体度数的测算[J].中华眼科杂志,2008,44(1):82-85. 被引量:9
  • 4Wang L, Koch DD. Comparison of intraocular lens power calculation methods in eyes that have undergone laserassisted insitu keratomileusis. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc, 2004, 102 : 189- 196.
  • 5Cheng AC, Ho T, Rao SK, et al. Posterior corneal curvature measurements with peripheral fitting zones before and after myopic LASIK using Orbscan II. J Refract Surg,2008 ,24 :807-810.
  • 6Cheng AC, Ho T, Lou S, et al. Introducing a new ratio useful in the estimation of preoperative corneal power in patients with myopic LASIK based on postoperative corneal data. Cornea,2009,28:1-4.
  • 7Beyoung JH, Sun WK, Sang WK, et al. Pentacam and Orbscan II measurements of posterior corneal elevation before and after photorefractive keratetomy. J Refreact Surg,2009,25:290-295.
  • 8Susannah Q, Stacy S, Bridget Z, et al. Comparison of Pentacam and Orbscan II on posterior curvature topography measurements in keratoconus eyes. Ophthalmology, 2006,113 : 1129-1132.
  • 9Savini G BP, Zanini M. Intraocular lens power calculation after myopic refractive surgery: theoretical comparison of different methods. Ophthalmology, 2006,113 : 127 1-1282.
  • 10aims G, Mc Ghee CN. Orbscan computerized topography : Attributes applications, and limitations. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2005,31 : 205 -220.

二级参考文献47

  • 1Speicher L. Intra-ocular lens calculation status after corneal refractive surgery. Curt Opin Ophthalmol,2001,12 : 17-29.
  • 2Seitz B, Langenbucher A, Nguyen NX, et al. Underestimation of intraocular lens power for cataract surgery after myopic photorefractive keratectomy. Ophthalmology, 1999,106:693-702.
  • 3Seitz B. Intraocular lens power calculation in eyes after corneal refractive surgery. J Refract Surg, 2000, 16:349-361.
  • 4Holladay JT, Prager TC, Chandler TY, et al. A three-part system for refining intraocular lens power calculations. J Cataract Refract Surg, 1988, 14:17-24.
  • 5Retzlaff JA, Sanders DR, Kraff MC. Development of the SRK/T intraocular lens implant power calculation formula. J Cataract Refract Surg, 1990, 16:333-340.
  • 6Hoffer KJ. The Hoffer Q formula: A comparison of theoretic and regression formulas. J Cataract Refract Surg, 1993, 19:700-712.
  • 7Holladay JT. Consultations in refractive surgery. Refract Corneal Surg, 1989, 5:203.
  • 8Hoffer KJ. Intraocular lens power calculation for eyes after refractive keratotomy. J Refract Surg, 1995, 21:490-493.
  • 9Koch D, Wang I. Calculating IOL power in eyes that have had refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2003, 29: 2039- 2042.
  • 10Wang L, Booth MA, Koch DD. Comparison of intraocular lens power calculations methods in eyes that have undergone LASIK. Ophthalmology, 2004, 111: 1825-1831.

共引文献8

同被引文献43

  • 1庄槿,袁胤,邱立红.不同切口对白内障术后散光的影响[J].眼视光学杂志,2004,6(4):231-232. 被引量:8
  • 2吴峥峥,瞿佳,樊映川,钟守国,黎静,陈斌.白内障超声乳化术后OrbscanⅡ角膜参数与内皮细胞丢失率相关性的研究[J].中国实用眼科杂志,2007,25(8):840-843. 被引量:6
  • 3Mejfa-Barbosa Y, Malacara-Hernandez D.A review of methods for measuring corneal topography [J].Optom Vis Sci, 2001,78 (4) : 240-253.
  • 4Chakrabarti H S,Craig J P, Brahma A,et al.Comparison of cor- nealthiekness measurements using ultrasound and Orbscan slitscanning to pography in normal and post- LASIK eyes[J].J Cataract Refract Surg, 2001,27 ( 11 ) : 1823-1828.
  • 5liu Z,Xie Y,Zha'ng M.Corneal topography and pachmetry in normal eyes[J].Zhong Hua Yen Ko Tsa,2001,37(2):125-128.
  • 6Hashemi H,Roshani M,Mehravaran S,Parsafar H,Yazdani K.Effect of corneal thickness on the agreement between ultrasound and Orbscan II pachymetry[J].J Cataract Refract Surg,2007,33 (10) : 1694-1700.
  • 7Buehl W,Stojnac D,Sacu S,et al.Comparison of three methods of measuring corneal thickness and anterior chamber depth[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2006,141 ( 1 ) : 7-12.
  • 8Lackner B, Schmidinger G,Pieh S.et al Repeatability and reproducibility of central corneal thickness measurement with Pentacam, Orbscan, and ultrasound [ J ].Optom Vis Sci, 2005,82 (10) : 892-899.
  • 9Jonuscheit S, Doughty MJ.Evidence for a relative thinning of the peripheral cornea with age in white European subjects[J]. Invest, Ophthalmol Vis Sci,2009,50(9) :4121-4128.
  • 10Grupcheva CN, Riley AF, Craig JP, et al.Analyzing small-incision cataract surgery by Orbscan II fourth-dimensional pachymetry mapping [J].J Cataract Refract Surg, 2002, 28 (12) : 2153-2158.

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部