期刊文献+

屈光不正患者行LASIK前后生活质量的对比研究 被引量:9

Comparative study of quality of life for ametropic patients before and after LASIK
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的利用美国国立眼科研究所研发的屈光不正生活质量调查表(NEI-RQL-42)对行LASIK的患者进行调查,为近视矫正术的进一步人性化发展提供科学依据。方法利用NEI-RQL-42在术前和术后3个月对患者进行问卷调查或电话访问,并进行评分,以评分的方式从13个方面对患者手术前后的生活质量进行评价和对比研究。结合患者手术前后各项客观检查结果,比较评分结果的差异。结果患者术前综合得分平均为64.57±7.87,术后3个月平均为84.47±3.62,二者比较差异有显著统计学意义(P<0.001);改善最明显的项目有:期望值、活动限制、视力波动、矫正依赖性、担忧程度、次佳矫正、外观,其评分与术前比较,差异均有显著统计学意义(均为P<0.001)。结论 NEI-RQL-42对检测患者生活质量的变化较灵敏;LASIK可以明显提高患者生活质量。 Objective To provide guidance for improving myoporthosis humanly by applying National Eye Institute Refractive Error Quality Of Life Instrument-42(NEI RQL-42)to LASIK patients.Methods The NEI RQL-42 was applied to patients by questionnaire or phone interview before operation and at 3 months after operation.The score was given and taken from 13 aspects to evaluate the quality of life before operation.Considering for objective examination before and after operation,the differences of score results were compared.Results The integrated scores were 64.57±7.87 before operation and 84.47±3.62 at 3 months after operation,there was significant difference(P0.001).The most obvious changed items were expectation value,activity limitation,visual fluctuations,dependence on correction,worry,suboptimal correction and appearance,there were significant differences(all P0.001).Conclusion NEI-RQL-42 is sensitive to examine the quality of life for patients.LASIK could improve the quality of life significantly.
出处 《眼科新进展》 CAS 北大核心 2011年第2期163-165,共3页 Recent Advances in Ophthalmology
关键词 LASIK 屈光不正 生活质量 LASIK ametropia quality of life
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Nichols J J, Mitchell GL, Saracino M, Zadnik K. Reliability and validity of refractive error-specific quality-of-life instruments [ J ]. Arch Ophthalmol, 2003,121 ( 9 ) : 1289-1296.
  • 2Toker E, Onal S, Eraslan M, Eyriparmak M. The Turkish version of the National Eye Institute Refractive Error Quality of Life Instrument:translation,validity and reliability[J].Qual Life Res, 2008,17(10) :1269-1276.
  • 3Ritchey ER, Barr JT, Mitchell GL. The comparison of overnight lens modalities ( COLM ) study [ J ]. Eye Contact Lens, 2005,31 (2) :70-75.
  • 4Berntsen DA,Mitchell GL,Barr JT. The effect of overnight contact lens corneal reshaping on refractive error-specific quality of life[J].Optom Vis Sci,2006,83(6) :354-359.
  • 5Lipson MJ. Musch DC. Synergeyes versus soft toric lenses:vision-related quality of life[J]. Optom Vis Sci,2007,84(7) :593- 597.
  • 6Hays RD, Mangione CM, Ellwein L, Lindblad AS, Spritzer KL, Mcdonnell PJ. Psychometric properties of the National Eye Institute-Refractive Error Quality of Life instrmnent[J]. Ophthalmology, 2003,110 ( 12 ) : 2292-2301.
  • 7McDonnell PJ, Mangione C, Lee P, Lindblad AS, Spritzer KL, Berry S, et al. Responsiveness of the National Eye Institute Refractive Error Quality of Life instrument to surgical correction of refractive error[ J ]. Ophthalmology ,2003,110 (12) :2302-2309.
  • 8Nichols J J, Twa MD, Mitchell GL. Sensitivity of the National Eye Institute Refractive Error Quality of Life instrument to refractive surgery outcomes[J].J Cataract Refract Surg, 2005,31 ( 12 ) : 2313-2318.
  • 9Berry S, Mangione CM, Lindblad AS, McDonnell PJ. Development of the National Eye Institute Refractive Error Correction Quality of Life questionnaire focus groups [J]. Ophthalmology, 2003,110(12) :2285-2291.
  • 10Hays RD, Woolley JM. The concept of clinically meaningful difference in health-related quality-of-life research [ J ]. Pharmacoeconomics.2000,18(5 ) :419-423.

同被引文献70

引证文献9

二级引证文献38

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部