摘要
关于帛书《要》篇"诗书礼乐不□百扁难以致之"一句中的"之"、补文、"扁"等问题,本文着眼于全局,通过数列式可能性分析的方法分别否定了以下几种情况:"之"字五道说、古法说;补文之不足/及/止百篇、不读百篇/遍等目前学界已经存在的五种说法,以及不足/止/及百遍、不■百篇等四种可能,进而肯定了"不■(籀)百遍"的合理性。
On the character zhi(之),the filling words and the character bian(扁)in the sentence of "shi shu Li Yue bu bai bian nan yi zhi zhi",by adopting the exclusive method and the holistic perspective in this article,the following several sitations are denied:the views of five"way"and gu fa(古法),five opinions of bu zu(足)/ji(及)/zhi(止)bai pian(篇)and bu du(读)bai pian(篇)/bian(遍),which have been existed in present academic circles,and four inexistent possibilities of bu zu(足)/zhi(止)/ji(及)bai bian(遍)and bu zhou(言糸)bai pian(篇).Therefore,we think the viewpoint of bu zhou(言系)bai bian(遍)is the most reasonable.
出处
《周易研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2011年第1期11-16,49,共7页
Studies of Zhouyi