期刊文献+

后金融危机时代信用评级机构的改革出路 被引量:11

The Reform of Credit Rating Agencies in Post Crisis Era
下载PDF
导出
摘要 美国次贷危机再次暴露信用评级机构的法律监管困境,即现行信用评级机构"发行人付费"收入模式存在根深蒂固的利益冲突问题。信用评级机构以"声誉"机制辩解,但存在重大理论缺陷和失败的经验事实证据。现行评级机构法律监管体制没能从根本上解决收入模式利益冲突的矛盾。信用评级机构未来的改革出路亟需解决利益冲突之困,可能的方案包括设立公共评级机构、恢复"订购人付费"模式、评级机构承担法律责任、政府付费购买评级服务等。 The sub-prime crisis exposed the predicament of credit rating agencies in legal regulation. Current " issuer-pay" income pattern incurs incorrigible conflict of interest. Credit rating agencies defend in the name of repu- tation, but their theory is seriously flawed and no empirical evidence can support their argumentation. Current legal regulation of credit rating agencies cannot solve the conflict of interest. In the future, the reform of credit rating agen- cies should focus on solving this predicament. We may set up public credit rating agencies and restore the pattern of "subscriber-pay". Credit rating agencies should bear legal liability. Government should pay for rating services.
作者 聂飞舟
机构地区 华东政法大学
出处 《上海金融》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第2期23-28,共6页 Shanghai Finance
关键词 金融危机 信用评级 收入模式 利益冲突 声誉辩解 Financial Crisis Credit Rating Income Pattern Conflict of Interest Defend in the Name of Reputation
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1陈三毛.美国信用评级业及其未来的监管政策调整[J].当代财经,2009(3):62-66. 被引量:16
  • 2Dawn Kopecki, The Credit Ratings Blame Game, http://www.businessweek.com/investor/content/sep2007/ pi20070927_267775.htm. Sep. 28, 2007.
  • 3王彦鹏.管控的失语与权力的高歌——美国信用评级机构助推次贷危机根源论[J].金融法苑,2009(1):43-58. 被引量:11
  • 4Questions for Mr. Geithner, N.Y. TIMES, Jan. 21, 2009, at A31.
  • 5Steven L Schwarcz, Private Ordering of Public Markets. The Rating Agency Paradox, University of Illinois Law Review, 2002, (2): 1-28.
  • 6Technical Comm.of The Int'l Org. of Sec. Comm'ns, Report on The Subprime Crisis, http://www.iosco.org/library/pubdocs/pdf/IOSCOPD273.pdf, May 2008.
  • 7J.C. COFFEE, Gatekeepers - The Professions and Corporate Goevrnance, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006:298.
  • 8William G. Mcguinness, John W. Brewer, Credit Rating Agencies Under the Microscope, New York Law Journal, January 5, 2009.
  • 9US. Sec, Amendments to Rules for Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations , http://www.sec. gov/rules/final/2009/34-59342.pdf. February 2, 2009.
  • 10Arthur R Pinto, Control and Responsibility of Credit Rating Agencies in the United States, the American Journal of Comparative Law, 2006, 54(fall):341-356.

二级参考文献39

  • 1梁琦.西方证券评级制度比较研究及其对我国的启示[J].证券市场导报,1999(11):41-44. 被引量:6
  • 2袁敏.资信评级作用、发展与监管初探[J].证券市场导报,2004(9):43-50. 被引量:5
  • 3吴风云,赵静梅.论美国证券信用评级霸权[J].世界经济,2005,28(12):44-51. 被引量:12
  • 4张强,佘桂荣.银行监管的市场约束理论进展[J].金融研究,2006(10):98-105. 被引量:22
  • 5Rutherfurd, John. Comments on Proposed Rules on Rating Agencies: File Number S7-04-07 [EB/OL]. http://www.sec. gov/comments/s7-04-17/lclucido1705.pdf, March 8, 2007.
  • 6Rousseanu, Stephane. Enhancing the Accountability of Credit Rating Agencies: the Case for a Disclosure-based Approach [J]. McGill Law Journal, December, 2006.
  • 7Eichengreen, Barry. Ten Questions about the Subprime Crisis [J]. Banque de France, Financial Stability Review, Special Issues on Liquidity, 2008, (11).
  • 8The Economist. Rating the Rating Agencies[J]. May 3!, 2007.
  • 9IMF. Structured Finance: Issues of Valuation and Disclosure [J]. Global Financial Report, April, 2008.
  • 10BIS. The Role of Ratings in Structured Finance: Issues and Implications[C]. Committee on the Global Financial System, Bank for Interantional Settlements, 9005.

共引文献104

同被引文献82

引证文献11

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部