期刊文献+

内容知识在本科生和研究生英语写作中的运用研究 被引量:14

Contrastive Study of Content Knowledge Application in Undergraduate and Graduate EFL Writing
原文传递
导出
摘要 本研究对372名本科生和349名研究生进行了问卷调查,以探讨英语写作中内容知识的使用特征。数据分析表明,受试者常用的知识来源为个人经历和思辨论据,其次为文献论据、权威论据和理论论据;常用知识呈现策略为主观表述、事实策略和多视角策略,较少使用的策略是转述策略、概括策略、批判策略、客观表述策略和数据策略。研究还发现,本科生和研究生在知识来源和知识呈现策略方面存在着显著性差异;知识运用与写作内容丰富性之间存在着显著正相关。 The present study examined features in the application of content knowledge in EFL writing by administering a questionnaire to 372 undergraduates and 349 graduate students.Data analysis revealed that the preferred knowledge sources are personal experience and speculation,followed by relevant literature,authoritative evidence and theoretical evidence.Furthermore,the preferred strategies of knowledge representation were found to be subjective perspective,fact using and multi-perspective while paraphrasing,summarizing,criticizing,objective perspective and data use were less frequently used.Significant differences were identified in terms of sources of content knowledge and strategies of knowledge representation between undergraduates and graduate students.Multi-group CFA with AMOS indicated that sources of content knowledge and the strategies were positively correlated to content density,and that paths from knowledge use to content density could distinguish undergraduates from graduate students.
作者 秦晓晴 毕劲
出处 《外语与外语教学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第1期24-30,共7页 Foreign Languages and Their Teaching
基金 中国外语教育研究中心第五批中国外语教育基金项目(项目编号:ZGWYJYJJ2010A30) 国家社会科学基金项目(项目编号:10BYY035)阶段性成果
关键词 内容知识 知识呈现策略 英语写作 content knowledge strategies of knowledge representation EFL Writing
  • 相关文献

参考文献39

  • 1Bachman,L. & A. Palmer. 1996. Language Testing in Practice[M].Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • 2Ballard, B. & J. Clanchy. 1997. Teaching International Students: A Brief Guide for Lecturers and Supervisors[M].Deakon: Education Australia.
  • 3Beaufort, A. 2004. Developmental gains of a history major: A ease for building a theory of disciplinary writing expertise[J]. Research in the Teaching of English,39(2) 136 -185.
  • 4Bereiter, C. & M. Scardamalia. 1987. The Psychology of Written Composition [ M ]. Hiltsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • 5Beminger,W. ,F. Fuller,et al. 1996. A process model of writing development across the life span[ J]. Educational Psychology Review,8 (3) :193 -218.
  • 6Borner, W. 1987. Writing in the foreign language classroom: Thoughts on a model [ A J. In Lorscher, W. & R, Schulze ( eds. ).Perspectives on Language in Performance ,Studies in Linguistics, Literary Criticism and Language Teaching and Learning ( II)[ C ].Tubingen: G. Narr.
  • 7Butteffield, E. , D. Hacker, et al. 1994. Topic knowledge, linguistic knowledge, and revision skill as determinants of text revision [ A ]. In Butterfield E. ( ed. ). Children's Writing: Toward a Process Theory of the Development of Skilled Writing[ C ]. Greenwich:JAI Press.
  • 8Campbell,C. 1990. Writing with others' words :Using background reading text in academic compositions[ A]. In Kroll,B. (ed.). Second Lan. guage Writing[C]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  • 9Coffin, C. , M. Curry, et al. 2003. Teaching Academic Writing [ M ]. New York: Routledge.
  • 10Deane, P. , N. Odendahl, et al. 2008. Cognitive Models of Writing [ R]. ETS Research Report ( No. RR -08 - 55 ), Princeton : Educational Testing Service.

二级参考文献30

共引文献513

同被引文献215

引证文献14

二级引证文献55

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部