期刊文献+

从“何为艺术”到“为何为艺术”——当代西方艺术体制理论的流变及启示 被引量:1

From "What is Art" to "What is Art For"——The changes and enlightenment of contemporary western art mechanism theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 现代艺术实践的诸多创新和实验使传统美学理论受到了前所未有的挑战,艺术和非艺术界限的模糊迫使美学家们对艺术定义进行重新思考。丹托的艺术界和迪基的艺术体制理论使我们的关注从"何为艺术"的关涉艺术内在属性的本质主义追问转移到"艺术品资格何以获得"的体制性的外部研究上来。美国社会学家贝克进一步发展了迪基的体制论,将艺术世界视为艺术实践的参与者在惯例的作用下反复合作的动态关系网络。无论是在后分析美学还是实证社会学的路径下,"艺术界"理论的演变给当代美学指明了一条新的思路,即摆脱传统哲学思辨的束缚,重新审视艺术与社会历史语境的关系。 Various innovation and experiment in the practice of modern arts make traditional aesthetic theory face unprecedented challenges. The blur boundary between arts and non-art forces esthetician rethink the defi- nition of art. Due to Danto' s art circles and Dickey' s art system, we have to focus'on the studies from inner attribute of "what is art" to external system of "how to acquire the quality of art work". Baker American soci- ologist developed Dickey' s theory, regarding art world as a dynamic relation network of art participators under practice effect. Either in analytic aesthetics or in empirical sociology, the evolution of " art world" theory shows a new way for contemporary aesthetics-shaking off the restriction of traditional philosophical speculation and rethinking the relation between art and context of social history.
作者 匡骁
出处 《学术交流》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第2期148-151,共4页 Academic Exchange
关键词 艺术定义 艺术体制论 艺术世界 当代美学 definition of art theory of art system art world contemporary aesthetics
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Becker, Howard. Art Worlds [ M]. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1982.
  • 2Danto, Arthur. "The Artworld", Aesthetics : The Big Questions [ M ]. ed. Carolyn Korsmeyer, Oxford : Blackwell, 1998.
  • 3Dilworth, John. "A Representational Theory of Artefacts and Artworks", British Journal of Aesthetics [ J]. 41. 4 (Octo- ber 2001 ).
  • 4Dickie, George. Art and the Aesthetics: An Institutional Analysis [ M ]. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1975.
  • 5Mortensen, Preben. Art in the Social Order : The Making of the Modern Conception of Art [ M ]. New York : State Univer- sity of New York Press, 1997.
  • 6殷曼楟.作为一个美学问题的艺术“命名”[J].深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版),2006,23(1):27-31. 被引量:3
  • 7M.李普曼.当代美学[M].邓鹏译.北京:光明日报出版社,1986:223.
  • 8殷曼椁.“艺术界”理论建构及其现代意义[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2009:89.

二级参考文献10

  • 1维特根斯坦 汤潮 范光棣译.哲学研究[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,1992.309节,65节,67节,66节,69节.
  • 2鲍曼.立法者与阐释者[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2000..
  • 3迪基.《何为艺术?》(Ⅱ)[A].迪菲.《艺术共同体及其它随笔》[C].,..
  • 4Arthur C. Danto. The Artworld [A]. Carolyn Korsmeyer. ed,Aesthetics: The Big Questions [C]. Cambridge: Blackwell,1998.
  • 5Arthur C. Danto. The Transfiguration of the Commonplace[J].The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 1974,33(2).
  • 6丹托.艺术的终结[M].南京:江苏人民出版社,2001..
  • 7John Dilworth. A Representational Theory of Artefacts and Artworks[J]. British Journal of Aesthetics, 2001,41 (4):368.
  • 8迪基.何为艺术?(Ⅱ)[A].李普曼.当代美学[C].北京:光明日报出版社,1986..
  • 9Howard S. Becket. Art Worlds[M]. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1982.137.
  • 10布尔迪厄 周宪译.纯美学的历史起源[A]..激进的美学锋芒[C].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2003.50-51.

共引文献4

同被引文献24

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部