状态特质抑郁问卷中文版在大学生中的信效度

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of State-Trait Depression Scale in college students

目的：考察状态特质抑郁问卷（State—Trait DepressionScale，STDEP）中文版在我国大学生群体中的适用性。方法：对16项版的STDEP进行翻译和回译，建立其中文版本。方便选取北京师范大学大一新生1654名，施测STDEP来分析问卷的内部一致性信度、结构效度和效标效度，并比较不同性别、专业、来源地受试的STDEP评分差异；从所有受试中随机抽取1312名完成贝克抑郁问卷（Beck Depression Inventory，BDI）、流调中心用抑郁量表（Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale，CES—D）、艾森克人格问卷（成人）（EysenckPersonalityQuestionnaire，EPQ）以检验STDEP的效标效度。结果：STDEP包含状态抑郁（S-DEP）和特质抑郁（T—DEP）2个分量表，2个分量表的内部一致性Cronbachd系数均〉0．9；验证性因素分析显示2个分量表RMSEA值分别为0．08和0．06，其CFI、NFI、IFI值均〉0．90；2个分量表与BDI、CES—D的相关在0．66～0．80之间（均P〈0．01）；差异分析表明，男生（n：498）T-DEP分高于女生（n=1156）（P=0．012），来自农村的学生（n=636）S-DEP、T—DEP分均高于来自城镇的学生（n=1018）（均P〈0．001）。结论：状态特质抑郁问卷中文版在中国大学生群体中有较高的信效度，适用于中国大学生抑郁状态和特质的评估。

Objective： To assess the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of State-Trait Depression Scale （STDEP） in college students in China. Methods： Totally 1654 freshmen had been chosen by convenience sampling to finish the scale. The internal consistency reliability and construct validity were evaluated. Score differences between gender, major and family background were analyzed. The criterion-related validity was also evaluated through correlating STDEP with Beck Depression Inventory （ BDI）, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale （CES-D） and Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. Results： The STDEP consisted of state clepression （S-DEP） and trait depression （T-DEP） . The Cronbach α coefficient for S-DEP and T-DEP were both above 0. 9. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the fit indices of two sub-scales for RMSEA were 0. 08and 0. 06, and the CFI, NFI and IFI were also above 0. 9. The correlations between two sub-scales and BDI, CES-D were significant （0. 66- 0. 80） （P 〈 0. 01 ） . Male （n = 498 ） had significantly higher scores in T-DEP than female （n = 1156） E （28. 8 ±8.1 ） vs. （27.8 ±7.4）, P =0. 012] . And the rural students had higher scores in both S- DEP and T-DEP than urban students E 29.4 ± 7.3 ） vs. （27.5 ± 7. 6）, （29. 5 ± 7. 5 ） vs. （ 27.2 ± 7.6 ） ; Ps 〈 0. 001 ] . Conclusion： The Chinese version of STDEP has good psychometrics properties and can be used in Chinese colleges.