摘要
乾嘉时期汉学兴起、主盟学坛,与宗奉宋学、倡导古文的桐城派产生激烈冲突,钱大昕批评方苞即为标志之一。基于汉学家立场,钱大昕反对儒家经典的文学化、试图以史法规范文学、主张文无定法,不仅体现出汉学与文学的背离,同时也为姚鼐建构桐城派古文理论提供了独特的理论资源。
The rise of sinology studies as main league of the academic field in Qianlong-Jiaqing period brought about intense conflicts between the sinologists and the Tongcheng School which proposes Songxue and ancient style prose, with Qian Daxin' s criticism on Fang Bao being an important mark. Qian Daxin opposed to the Confucian classics of literature and tried to standardize literature through Shifa, advoeaing the non-fixed method based on the sinologist position. The theory not only reflects a departure of Sinology from literature, but also provides specific resources for the construction of the classical theory of Tongcheng School.
出处
《安徽农业大学学报(社会科学版)》
2011年第1期109-113,共5页
Journal of Anhui Agricultural University:SOC.SCI.
基金
安徽农业大学稳定和引进人才科研项目(yj2008-33:<袁枚的汉学研究>)
安徽农业大学繁荣发展哲学社会科学基金项目(2008zs4047:<乾嘉汉学家的文论研究>)
关键词
汉学
桐城派
钱大昕
方苞
义法
sinology
the Tongeheng School
Qian Daxin
Fang Bao
the Yifa theory