摘要
文章以金县1-1油田开发工程为例,从理论及计算2方面对集中补偿和就地补偿2种方案进行比较分析,证明就地补偿方案更具优势,并最终采纳该方案;通过对几种常用的无功补偿装置性能及价格的综合分析,得出TSC是较合理的补偿方式的结论;在此基础上针对晶闸管投切电容器TSC,分析其容量设计过程及应注意的问题。
In this paper,Jin county 1-1 oil field development project is taken as an example,such two schemes as concentration and local compensation are compared and analyzed from theory and calculation.It is proved that the local compensation scheme,which is adopted finally,possesses more advantage.It is also concluded that TSC is more reasonable compensation way through comprehensive analysis of features and prices of a few kinds of normally used reactive compensation device.Further more,the capacity design process and cautions for the thyristor switched capacitor（TSC） are analyzed.
出处
《电力电容器与无功补偿》
2011年第1期20-23,共4页
Power Capacitor & Reactive Power Compensation
关键词
无功补偿
海洋平台
电容器
晶闸管投切电容器(TSC)
reactive power compensation
offshore platform
capacitor
thyristor switched capacitor（TSC）
