国际体育仲裁透明化之释证——以CAS仲裁法典及奥林匹克仲裁规则为据

Openness of international sports arbitration——CAS Arbitration Code and Olympic Games Arbitration Rules as evidences

仲裁私密性是国际仲裁的比较性特征,这也内化在国际体育仲裁的多层次制度安排之中。但与国际商事仲裁不同,国际体育仲裁在多个方面表现出强烈的透明化趋势:仲裁第三人制度和合并仲裁,专家证人的介入,当事人反向约定,仲裁裁决之公布,以及观察员附条件的介入。究其因由,在于体育仲裁的时效性、求实性,主题的非私密性,裁决的公益性,以及体育法制统一化与体育法治化等综合原因。

Arbitration privacy is the comparative characteristics of international arbitration,embodied in the multi-level arrangements of international sports arbitration.By contrast with the international commercial arbitration,international sports arbitration is more open in several aspects,such as the Third Party in arbitration and Consolidation of Arbitration,experts interposition,agreement otherwise by parties,releasing of arbitral award,and inspection by observer.This openness is comprehensively caused by the timeliness,matter-of-act attitude,and non-private subjects,public interests of arbitral award,and the unified sports laws and ruling by laws in sports.