期刊文献+

经皮肾镜联合输尿管软镜碎石术治疗鹿角形肾结石体会 被引量:13

Combined percutaneous nephrolithotomy and lithotripsy through flexible ureteroscope in the treatment of staghorn calculi
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的总结单一微通道经皮肾镜碎石术(MPCNL)联合输尿管软镜碎石术治疗鹿角形。肾结石的临床经验体会。方法57例鹿角形肾结石均采用MPCNL和输尿管软镜碎石术联合治疗。结石大小(2.7cm×3.3cm~3.8cm×5.2cm),平均3.7cm×4.1cm。结果46例鹿角形结石一期碎石、取石成功,平均手术时间128min,平均出血量80mL(20~150mL),结石清除率为80.7%;11例残余结石主要集中于肾下盏,少部分位于肾中盏,于术后1个月行二期输尿管软镜碎石术,平均手术时间为57min,结石总清除率为93%(53/57)。4例术后仍有少量结石残留,大小为0.4~0.8cm,予以体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)治疗,随访3个月,结石清除2例。结论MPCNL联合输尿管软镜碎石术治疗鹿角形肾结石可有效提高结石清除率,减少创伤及并发症。 Objective To summarize the clinical experience of combined single-access minimally inva- sive pereutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) and lithotripsy through flexible ureteroscope in the treatment of staghorn calculi. Methods Fifty-seven cases of renal staghorn calculi underwent combined MPCNL and lithotripsy through flexible ureteroscope. The size of calculi was (2.7 cm× 3.3 cm - 3.8 cm× 5.2 cm), 3.7 cm × 4. 1 cm on average. Results The success rate of stone fragmentation was 80.7% (46/57) after the first stage of operation, duration of which was 128 min on average. The average loss of blood was 80 mL (20 - 150 mL). Eleven patients with residual calculi in the middle and lower calyx were also underwent the second stage of operation after 5 - 7 days. The average operation duration of the second stage was 57 rain and the total clearance rate was 93% (53/57). Four cases had a few of residual calculi with size of 0. 4 -0.8 cm and went on with the treatment of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy(ESWL). Two cases were stone-free in the follow-up for 3 months. Conclusion MPCNL combined with lithotripsy through flexible ureteroscope on the treatment of staghorn calculi can decrease the therapeutic risk and complication, increase the rate of stone-free and safety.
出处 《国际外科学杂志》 2011年第2期86-87,共2页 International Journal of Surgery
关键词 肾结石 经皮肾镜 输尿管镜 固态激光 碎石术 Calculi Nephrostomy, percutaneous Ureteroscopes Lasers, solid- state Lithotripsy
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献11

  • 1胡卫列,邓志雄,赵永斌,邱晓拂.输尿管软镜在上尿路疾病诊治中的应用[J].中国微创外科杂志,2008,8(4):335-336. 被引量:51
  • 2Dasgupta P, Cynk MS, Buhitude MF, et al. Flexible ureterorenoscopy: prospective analysis of the Guy' s experience. Ann R Coll Surg Engl,2004,86 (5) :367 - 370.
  • 3Albala DM, Assimos DG, Clayman RV, et al. Lower pole I: a prospective randomized trial of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrostolithotomy for lower pole nephrolithiasisinitial results. J Urol,2001,166 ( 6 ) :2072 - 2080.
  • 4Pasqui F, Dubosq F, Tchala K, et al. Impact on activescope deflection and irrigation flow of all endoscopic working tools during flexible ureteroscopy. Eur Urol,2004,45 ( 1 ) :58 - 64.
  • 5Elbahnasy AM, Shalhav AL, Hoenig DM, et al. Lower caliceal stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy :The impact of lower pole radiographic anatomy. J Urol, 1998,159 (3) :676 - 682.
  • 6Saidi A, Combes F, Delaporte V, et al. Flexible ureteroscopy and holmium-Yag laser: material and technique. Prog Urol, 2006, 16 (1) :19 -24.
  • 7Johnson GB, Portela D, Grasso M. Advanced ureteroscopy: wireless and sheathless. J Endourol, 2006,20 ( 8 ) : 552 - 555.
  • 8Delvecchio FC, Auge BK, Brizuela RM, et al. In vitro analysis of stone fragmentation ability of the FREDDY laser. J Endourol,2003, 17(3) :177 - 179.
  • 9胡俊杰,廖国强,卞崔冬,袁涛.输尿管镜下双频激光碎石术治疗输尿管结石268例报告[J].中国微创外科杂志,2007,7(10):946-947. 被引量:16
  • 10孙颖浩,王芝芳,王林辉,廖国强,许传亮,高旭,杨庆,万蓬.钬激光治疗泌尿系结石(附155例报告)[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2001,22(11):691-693. 被引量:199

共引文献181

同被引文献94

  • 1陈修德,金讯波.经皮肾镜碎石术经验总结[J].泌尿外科杂志(电子版),2011,3(3):1-4. 被引量:7
  • 2赵中伟,张晓波,陈雄,戴元清,李东杰,白耀,肖溪.经皮肾镜联合输尿管软镜治疗肾结石对老年患者肾功能的影响[J].中南大学学报(医学版),2015,40(3):276-280. 被引量:27
  • 3葛广成,李中兴,冯瑞,贾跃军,钟文.输尿管软镜联合经皮肾镜治疗鹿角状肾结石的临床研究[J].微创泌尿外科杂志,2014,3(6):357-359. 被引量:5
  • 4钱庆鹏,张晓春,那彦群.经皮肾镜取石术的并发症与对策[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,2007,22(7):491-493. 被引量:130
  • 5Best SL, Nakada SY. Flexible ureterosc- opy is effective for proximal ureteral stones in both obese and nonobese patients: A two-year, single-surgeon experience [J]. Urology,2010,34(2): 123-125.
  • 6Ibarluzea G, Scoffone C M, Cracco C M, et al. Supine Valdivia and modified lithotorny position for simultaneous anterograde and retrograde endourological access [J]. BJU Int, 2007, 100 (5):233-236.
  • 7Landman J, Venkatesh R, Lee D I, et al. Combind percutane- ous and retrograde approach to staghorn calculi with application of the ureteral access sheath to facilitate percutaneous nephro- lithotomy [J]. J Urol, 2003, 169 (1): 64-67.
  • 8Edgcombe H, Carter K, Yarrow S. Anaesthesia in the prone position [J]. Br J Anaesth, 2008, 100 (2) : 165-183.
  • 9Miano R, Scoffone C, de Nunzio C, et al. Position: prone or supine is the issue of percutaneous nephrolithotomy [J]. J En- dourol, 2010, 24 (6): 931-938.
  • 10Hofinaim R, 01bert P, Weber J, et al. Clinical experience with a new ultrasonicand Lithoclast combination for percutaneous litholapaxy[J]. BJU Int, 2002, 90(1): 16-19.

引证文献13

二级引证文献89

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部