期刊文献+

战争的起源:研究层次的多样性 被引量:1

Causes of War:Multiple Levels of Analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 学者们为探索战争的起源做出了很大的努力,而这一领域的研究,呈现出较多的研究层次。本文从不同的研究层次:个体、组织、集团、阶级、国家直至国际体系层次出发寻找战争的起源。不同的研究层次对战争的起源有着相当不同的回答。多样化的研究层次也为我们提供了多样化的视角。我们难以找到由一个研究层次主导下的、解释战争起源的通论。在今后较长一段时间里,研究层次的多样性可能仍旧继续主导战争起源的研究。 War is an important issue in international security.Many scholars have made great efforts in exploring causes of war.These researches constitute multiple levels of analysis,from individual level,organizational level,group level,class level,state level to international system level.Different levels of analysis have various answers to this question.Diversified levels of analysis help us look at things from different perspectives.It is difficult to have a general theory,which is dominated by one level of analysis,in answering the causes of war.In the future,multiple levels of analysis will still dominate the research in this field.
作者 黄琪轩
出处 《国际论坛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第2期51-57,80-81,共7页 International Forum
  • 相关文献

参考文献38

  • 1[古希腊]修昔底德.《伯罗奔尼撒战争史》[M],徐松岩,黄贤全译,广西师范大学出版社,2004年版,第14页,第14页,第15页.
  • 2David Singer, "The Level of Analysis Problem in International Relations", in Klaus Knorr and Sidney Verba eds, The International System: Theoretical Essays, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1961.
  • 3李巍,王勇.国际关系研究层次的回落[J].国际政治科学,2006(3):112-142. 被引量:35
  • 4陈小鼎.国际关系研究层次的上升与回落[J].世界经济与政治,2008(7):48-51. 被引量:14
  • 5Robert Jervis, Perception and Misperception in International Politics, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1976.
  • 6Stephen Rosen, War and Human Nature, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2005, p. 1, p. 5, p.31, pp. 181-182.
  • 7Jack Levy, "Misperception and the Causes of War: Theoretical Linkages and Analytical Problems", World Politics, Vol. 36, 1983, pp. 76-99.
  • 8Benjamin Page and Robert Shapiro, The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans 'policy Preferences, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992, p. 295.
  • 9Richard Eichenbcrg, " Gender Differences in Public Attitudes toward the Use of Force by the United States, 1990- 2003", International Security, Vol. 28, 2003, pp. 110-141.
  • 10Mary Caprioli and Mark Boyer, "Gender, Violence, and International Crisis", Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 45, 2001,pp.503-518.

二级参考文献23

  • 1唐小松.论现实主义的发展及其命运[J].世界经济与政治,2004(7):7-14. 被引量:22
  • 2[美]詹姆斯·多尔蒂 小罗伯特·普法尔茨格拉夫著 阎学通 陈寒溪.《争论中的国际关系理论》[M].北京:世界知识出版社,2003年版.第631页.
  • 3周方银.《国际结构与策略互动》,第17页.
  • 4Kenneth Waltz, Theory of International Politics, Reading, Mass. : Addison- Wesley, 1979 .
  • 5Robert Keohane, After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy, Princeton, N.J. : Princeton University Press, 1984.
  • 6Alexander Wendt, Social Theory of International Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
  • 7[德]马克思·韦伯著,韩水法,莫茜译.《社会科学方法论》.北京:中央编译出版社,2005年版,第43-47页.
  • 8Kenneth N. Wahz,"International Polities is Not Foreign Policy," Security Studies, Vol. 6, No. 1, 1996, pp. 52 -57.
  • 9Barry Buzan," The Level of Analysis Problem in International Relations Reconsidered," in Ken Booth and Steven Smith,eds. , International Relations Theory Today, Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 201-206.
  • 10David Singer, "The Level of Analysis Problem in International Relations," World Politics, Vol. 14, No. 1, 1961, pp. 77 -92 .

共引文献47

同被引文献308

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部