摘要
目的探讨人胰岛素类似物与人胰岛素减低糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平的差异。方法随机抽取120例2型糖尿病患者,按住院号奇偶数分为人胰岛素类似物组和人胰岛素组,每组60例,比较两组在患病结局、血糖控制、HbA1c之间的差异。结果人胰岛素类似物组治疗良好率(83.3%,50/60)与人胰岛素组治疗良好率(86.7%,52/60)比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。治疗前两组空腹血糖和餐后2h血糖比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05),治疗2周后两组比较差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05);两组内治疗前与治疗2周后空腹血糖和餐后2h血糖比较差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。治疗前两组HbA1c比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05),治疗3个月后两组比较差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05);两组内治疗前与治疗3个月后HbA1c比较差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论人胰岛素类似物与人胰岛素在控制糖尿病患者血糖和HbA1c方面效果均较好,但人胰岛素类似物优于人胰岛素。
Objective To compare the level ofglycosylated hemoglobin (HbAlc)in patients with diabetes treated with aetrapid monotard analog or actrapid monotard. Methods One hundred and twenty patients with type 2 diabetes were divided into aetrapid monotard analog group and aetrapid monotard group with 60 cases in each by admission number. Fasting blood glucose (FBG), 2-hour postprandial blood glucose (2hPBG), HbAlc were obtained and analyzed. Results The overall cure rate were similar between aetrapid monotard analog group and actrapid monotard group (.83.3% ,50/60 vs. 86.7%,52/60, P〉 0.05). There was no significant difference in FBG, 2hPBG before treatment between two groups (P 〉 O.05),but there was significant difference at 2 weeks after treatment between two groups (P 〈 0.05 ) . There was no significant difference in HbAIe before treatment between two groups (P 〉 0.05 ), but there was significant difference at 3 months after treatment between two groups (P 〈 0.05 ) . FBG, 2hPBG, HbA1c after treatment were improved compared with before treatment in two groups (P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusion Actrapid monotard analogprovides better blood glucose control compare with actrapid monotard while providing the convenience of injecting immediately before meals.
出处
《中国医师进修杂志》
2011年第4期17-19,共3页
Chinese Journal of Postgraduates of Medicine