期刊文献+

公平交换协议形式逻辑 被引量:2

Formal Logic for Fair Exchange Protocols
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在深入分析公平交换协议现有研究和各项安全属性的基础上,由于信任逻辑方法难以分析乐观公平交换协议的公平性和时限性,提出一种公平交换协议形式化模型和推理逻辑.新模型将信道错误转化为攻击行为,将参与者分为诚实与不诚实两类,并将这些威胁归结为两类入侵者.基于模型检查思想,新逻辑将协议定义为Kripke结构的演化系统,将参与者看作异步环境中的通信进程,定义了时间算子控制实体行为的转换.同时,新逻辑继承了信任逻辑简单、实用的优点.以一个典型协议为例,采用逻辑结合模型检查的方法,演示了分析协议的过程.发现并改进了协议实例的安全缺陷.案例分析表明,新逻辑能够分析公平交换协议的公平性和时限性. The fairness and punctuality of optimistic fair exchange protocols are difficult to analyze by using belief logic. Based on the studies of existing formal models and security attributes in fair exchange, a formal model for logic reasoning and fair exchange protocols is proposed. In the model, the channel errors are transferred to the attacker's behaviors, the participants are divided into honest and dishonest ones, and the threats are attributed to two types of intruders. Based on the idea of model checking, the protocols are defined as an evolved system that has the Kripke structure, and the parties are considered as processes in an asynchronous environment. The new logic stimulates the time operators to control the transfers among the participants' behaviors and is simple and easy to use. Through typical optimistic fair exchange protocols, the article demonstrates the course of protocol analysis. Two flaws of the protocol are discovered and improved. The case study shows that the new logic can be used to analyze the fairness and timeliness of fair exchange nrotocols.
出处 《软件学报》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2011年第3期509-521,共13页 Journal of Software
基金 国家自然科学基金(90818028) 国家科技支撑计划(2008BAH37B04)
关键词 异步通信 公平交换 形式化分析 推理逻辑 模型检查 asynchronous communication fair exchange formalize analysis logical reasoning model checking
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

  • 1QING Sihan1,2,3 & LI Gaicheng1,2,3 1. Engineering Research Center for Information Security Technology, Institute of Software, Chinese Aca- demy of Sciences, Beijing 100080, China,2. Beijing Zhongke Ansheng Corporation of Information Technology, Beijing 100080, China,3. Graduate School of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100039, China.A formal model of fair exchange protocols[J].Science in China(Series F),2005,48(4):499-512. 被引量:9

共引文献8

同被引文献21

  • 1卿斯汉.一种电子商务协议形式化分析方法[J].软件学报,2005,16(10):1757-1765. 被引量:23
  • 2薛锐,冯登国.安全协议的形式化分析技术与方法[J].计算机学报,2006,29(1):1-20. 被引量:60
  • 3GU Yong-gen,FU Yu-xi,ZHONG Fa-rong,et al.A generic model foranalyzing security protocols[C]//Proc of the 3rd International Confe-rence on Mathematical Methods,Models,and Architectures for Com-puter Network Security.Berlin:Springer Verlag,2005:119-128.
  • 4BACKES M,MAFFEI M,UNRUH D.Zero-knowledge in the applieedPI-calculus and automated verification of the direct anonymous attesta-tion protocol[C]//Proc of IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy.Washington DC:IEEE Computer Society,2008:202-215.
  • 5WANG Zhang-kai.Analyzing a fair exchange e-commerce protocolusing CSP and FDR[C]//Proc of International Conference on e-Edu-cation,e-Business,e-Management and e-Learning.Washington DC:IEEE Computer Society,2010:303-307.
  • 6BRIAIS S,NESTMANN U.A formal semantics for protocol narrations[J].Theoretical Computer Science,2007,389(3):484-511.
  • 7CATHALO J.Provable security and fairness in crypto-graphic identi-fication and signature schemes[D].Wallonie,Belgique:UniversitéCatholique de Louvain,2007.
  • 8SHAIKH S A,BUSH V J,SCHNEIDER S A,et al.Specifying authen-tication using signal events in CSP[J].Computers Security,2009,28(5):310-324.
  • 9陈锋,张怡,苏金树,韩文报.攻击图的两种形式化分析[J].软件学报,2010,21(4):838-848. 被引量:51
  • 10高悦翔,彭代渊,闫丽丽.认证邮件协议的安全性分析与改进[J].电子科技大学学报,2013,42(2):300-305. 被引量:2

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部