从程序正义到摆平“正义”:法官的多重角色分析

From Procedural Justice to Settling "Justice":The Multiple Roles of Judges

法院如何建构其主体性?是当下中国社会面临的时代之问。在规则之治、程序正义的逻辑下展开运作的司法因其制度刚性有余而操作柔性不足,难以有效回应中国社会仍停留在"传统"的具体情境,从而遭到实用主义的解构。但是,在"调审合一"制度路径下游刃有余的实用主义司法哲学实际上亦并不足以构成对"法院主体性"的命题支撑,甚至可能是更加错误的道路。作为"法院主体性"的命题表达,能够体现法院"明确的司法功能"并与其他权力部门相区分的主体特质始终只在于"独立"的审判。

How to construct the subjectivity of judicial courts is the question in time for China＇ s society today. The judiciary under the logic of rule under norms and procedural justice is deconstructed by pragmatism since it is lack of flexibility and cannot meet China＇ s social requirement which stems from tradition. However, the pragmatic judicial philosophy which runs well in the context of combining investigation and justice is inadequate to support the proposition of the subjectivity of judicial courts, but a rather misleading approach. To express the proposition of the subjectivity of judicial courts, the core is independent justice because this can embody the judicial function of courts explicitly and differentiate from other bodies of state power.