行政裁量基准的理论悖论及其消解

The Theoretical Dilemma of Criteria of Administrative Discretion and Its Solution

行政裁量基准的兴起既是行政机关对社会呼唤执法公正的积极回应,也是行政机关抵御社会资本侵蚀实现自我保护的切实需要,体现出规则之治意识的觉醒,理应成为转型中国核心的行政裁量控制术。裁量基准的智识资源更多来自地方性知识而非行业性智慧,应当承认基层行政执法机关所拥有的基准制定权。作为一类具有规范具体化和解释功能的行政规则,裁量基准效力的外部化是一个普遍的世界性现象,有关裁量基准事实拘束力和法律拘束力辨析的意义日趋弱化。对行政裁量基准诸多理论悖论及其消解的探究,能够为裁量基准课题研究的及时转向扫清障碍。

The rise of administrative discretion criteria is a positive response to the call of fair execution of law, and a measure of self - protection of administrative organs against social capitals. It reflects the weakening of rule under law and should be the core controlling measure on administrative discretion. Intellectual resources for discretion come from local knowledge rather than professional wit, thus grassroots administrative organs should be recognized for their power to create such criteria. As a type of administrative rules with normative and explanation function, administrative discretion criteria get its externality. Such phenomena are world- wide and it became less and less important to differentiate fact binding and legal binding nature of discretion criteria. The study of theoretical dilemma and its solution will sweep the barriers for the transition of the study on administrative discretion criteria.