期刊文献+

肾移植患者霉酚酸谷浓度与急性排斥反应及药物毒性相关性的研究 被引量:4

Relationship between mycophenolic acid plasma trough level with rejection and toxicity in renal transplant patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价肾移植术后对霉酚酸酯(MMF)进行药物浓度监测的意义。方法 107例肾移植患者分别于术后1、2、3、4-6、7-12个月5个时间段内化验霉酚酸谷浓度(MPA-C0),并记录患者期间发生的急性排斥及药物毒性事件,将患者分为排斥组(Ⅰ组)、药物毒性组(Ⅱ组)、正常组(Ⅲ组)。比较各组MPA-C0水平。结果排斥发生率为12.1%(13/107),药物毒性发生率为35.5%(38/107)。Ⅰ组和Ⅲ组(1个月)、Ⅱ组和Ⅲ组间MPA-C0水平均有统计学差异(P〈0.05);ROC曲线显示,MPA-C0水平为1.55 mg/L是识别排斥反应是否发生的最佳截断值,MPA-C0水平为2.50 mg/L是识别毒副反应是否发生的最佳截断值。结论对肾移植术后服用MMF的患者进行MPA-C0监测,对MMF用量进行个体化调整,有利于预防排斥反应和药物毒性发生,减少并发症,提高移植肾存活率。 Objective To evaluate the role of drug concentration monitoring of mycophenolate mofetil(MMF) in renal transplantation patients.Methods Mycophenolic acid plasma trough level(MPA-C0) of 107 renal transplantation patients at the time of month 1,month 2,month 3,month 4-6,and month 7-12 was monitored,and drug toxicity and rejection events during each period were recorded.According to rejection and drug toxicity events occured or not,the patients were divided into rejection group(groupⅠ),toxicity group(groupⅡ) and control group(groupⅢ).Then MPA-C0 level was compared between groups.Results Incidence of rejection was 12.1%(13/107) and incidence of drug toxicity was 35.5%(38/107).There was significantly different between groupⅠ and group Ⅲ(month 1),groupⅡ and groupⅢ.ROC curve showed a MPA level of 1.55 mg/L early post-transplantation best discriminated patients with and without rejection,and an MPA level of 2.50 mg/L best discriminated patients with and without toxicity later post-transplantation.Conclusion Monitoring of MPA-C0 and individual dose adjustment could be helpful to reduce complications and improve graft survival rate.
出处 《山东医药》 CAS 北大核心 2011年第8期3-5,共3页 Shandong Medical Journal
关键词 霉酚酸 谷浓度 肾移植 移植物排斥 药物毒性 mycophenolic acid trough level renal transplantation graft rejection drug toxicity
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献9

  • 1Placebo-controlled study of mycophenolate mofetil combined with cyclosporin and corticosteroids for prevention of acute rejection. European Mycophenolate Mofetil Cooperative Study Group. Lancet, 1995,345 : 1321-1325.
  • 2Sollinger HW, Deierhoi MH, Belzer FO, et al. RS-61443-a phase I clinical trial and pilot rescue study. Transplantation, 1992, 53:428-432.
  • 3A blinded, randomized clinical trial of mycophenolate mofetil for the prevention of acute rejection in cadaveric renal transplantation. The Tricontinental Myeophenolate Mofetil Renal Transplantation Study Group. Transplantation, 1996,61:1029-1037.
  • 4Van Gelder, T, Hilbrands LB, Vanrenterghem Y. et al. A randomized double-blind, multicenter plasma concentration controlled study of the safety and efficacy of oral mycophenolate mofetil for the prevention of acute rejection after kidney transplantation. Transplantation, 1999, 68 : 261-266.
  • 5Mourad M, Malaise J, Chaib Eddour D, et al. Pharmacokinetic basis for the efficient and safe use of low-dose rnycophenolate mofetil in combination with tacrolimus in kidney transplantation. Clin Chem,2001,47 : 1241-1248.
  • 6Weber LT, Shipkova M, Armstrong VW, et al. The pharmacokinetic- pharmacodynamic relationship for total and free mycophenolic acid in pediatric renal transplant recipients: a report of the German study group on mycophenolate mofetil therapy. J Am Soc Nephrol,2002 ,13 :759-768.
  • 7Mourad M, Wallemacq P, Konig J, et al. Therapeutic monitoring of mycophenolate mofetil in organ transplant recipients: is it necessary? Clin Pharmacokinet,2002,41:319-327.
  • 8Krumme B, Wollenberg K, Kirste G, et al. Drug monitoring of mycophenolic acid in the early period after renal transplantation. Transplant Proc, 1998,30 : 1773-1774.
  • 9HubnerGI, Eismann R, Sziegolcit W. Relationship between mycophenolate mofetil side effects and mycophenolic acid plasma trough levels in renal transplant patients. Arzneimittelforschung, 2000,50:936-940.

共引文献2

同被引文献41

引证文献4

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部