重新诠释有独立请求权第三人

To Reinterpret the Third Party with Independent Claim

由于我国立法及理论界是从实体请求权概念出发理解有独立请求权第三人,所以,实务中难以对有独立请求权第三人作出正确判断。故应重新界定有独立请求权第三人,增加诈害防止作为有独立请求权第三人参加诉讼的根据,明确"独立请求权"与本诉既有请求权之间的牵连性,才能对有独立请求权第三人作出正确判断。

In China,as legislation and theory circle interpret the third party with independent claim from the concept of substantive claim right,it＇s difficult to judge the third party with independent claim correctly in practice.To acquire correct judgment,we should redefine the third party with independent claim,add fraud prevention as the basis for the third party with independent claim to participate in litigation,and determine the relevance between the independent claim right and the existing claim right.