期刊文献+

两种不同方法治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠临床分析 被引量:7

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较两种不同方法治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的临床疗效。方法 30例剖宫产瘢痕妊娠分为两组,对照组15例采用甲氨蝶呤(MTX)加米非司酮治疗,观察组15例采用介入加刮宫术治疗;比较两组治疗后血-人绒毛膜促性腺激素(-hCG)、血细胞的变化情况以及住院时间和转经时间。结果两组治疗前Hb和WBC差异均无统计学意义(均>0.05);两组治疗后血红蛋白(Hb)和白细胞(WBC)差异均无统计学意义(均>0.05)。观察组住院时间和转经时间均短于对照组(均<0.05)。两组阴道出血时间差异有统计学意义(<0.05)。结论子宫动脉栓塞术加刮宫术治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠较MTX加米非司酮片治疗的效果好,住院时间短,月经恢复快,不良反应少,值得临床推广应用。
作者 王芝英
出处 《现代实用医学》 2011年第1期87-88,93,F0003,共4页 Modern Practical Medicine
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献26

  • 1刘欣燕,范光升,金征宇,杨宁,姜玉新,盖铭英,郭丽娜,王友芳,郎景和.子宫下段妊娠人工流产术中大出血临床分析——附四例报告[J].中华妇产科杂志,2003,38(3):162-164. 被引量:135
  • 2尹雪彬,范光升,张川.超选择性子宫动脉栓塞治疗人工流产术中大出血二例[J].北京医学,1995,17(3):191-191. 被引量:12
  • 3白骏,徐望明,杨菁,王大刚,魏敏.剖宫产术后子宫切口愈合情况的B超与临床监测[J].中华妇产科杂志,1997,32(4):195-197. 被引量:62
  • 4Valley MT,Pierce JC,Daniel TB, et al. Cesarean scar pregnancy imaging and treatment with conservative surgery. Obstet Gynecol, 1998,91:838-840.
  • 5Cynthia Chazotte, Wayne R, Cohen. Catastrophic complications of previous cesarren section. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990.163:738-742.
  • 6Pierre-Amaud Godin, Salim Bassil,Jacques Donnez. An ectopic pregnancy developing in a previous caesarian section. Fertil Steril, 1997,57:398-400.
  • 7Herman A, Weinraub Z, Avrech O, et al. Follow - up and outcome of isthmic pregnancy located in a previous caesarean section sear. Br J Obstet Gynecol, 1995.102 : 839 - 841.
  • 8Chen Hy,Chen sJ,Hsieh FJ. Observation of cesarean section scar by transvaginal ultrasonography. Ultrasonund Med Bio, 1990, 16 : 443 -447.
  • 9David Mp, Bergman A, Delighdish L. Cervico - isthmic pregnancy carried to term. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1980,56:247 -252.
  • 10Stephanie ASH, Farrell SA. Hysteroscopic resection of a cervical ectopic pregnancy. Fertil Steril, 1996.66:842-844.

共引文献361

同被引文献73

  • 1朱俊彦,狄文.剖宫产术后瘢痕妊娠不同治疗方法的疗效分析[J].上海交通大学学报(医学版),2011,31(11):1621-1624. 被引量:23
  • 2Jurkovic D, Hillaby K, Woelfer B, et al. First-trimester di- agnosis and management of pregnancies implanted into the lower uterine segment cesarean section scar [ J ]. Ultra- sound Obstet Gynecol, 2003,21 (3) :220-227.
  • 3Seow K M, Huang L W, Lin Y H, et al. Cesarean scar pregnancy: Issues in manage-ment [ J ]. Uhrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2004,23 ( 3 ) :247-253.
  • 4Ravina J H, Herbreteau D, Ciraru-Vigneron N, et al. Mer- land. Arterial embolisation to treat uterine myomata [ J ]. Lancet, 1995,346(8976) :671-672.
  • 5Li C, Li C, Feng D, et al. Transcatheter arterial chemoem- bolization versus systemic methotrexate for the management of cesarean sear pregnancy [ J ]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2011,113(3) :178-182.
  • 6Lian F, Wang Y, Chen W, et al. Uterine artery emboliza- tion combined with local methotrexate and systemic metho- trexate for treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy with differ- ent uhrasonographic pattern[J]. Cardiovasc Intervent Radi- ol, 2012,35(2) :286-291.
  • 7Wu X, Zhang X, Zhu J, et al. Caesarean scar pregnancy: comparative efficacy and safety of treatment by uterine artery chemoembolization and systemic methotrexate injection[ J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2012,161 ( 1 ) :75-79.
  • 8Yang X Y, Yu H, Li Km, et al. Uterine artery embolisati- on combined with local methotrexate for treatment of caesar- ean scar pregnancy[J]. BJOG, 2010,117(8) :990-996.
  • 9Zhuang Y, Huang Lili. Uterine artery embolization com- pared with methotrexate for the management of pregnancy implanted within a cesarean scar [ J ]. Am J Obstet Gyne- col, 2009,201 ( 2 ) : 152e1- 152e3.
  • 10Lam P M, Lo K W, Lau T K. Unsucceasful mrdical treat- ment of cesareat scarectopic pregnancy with systemic metho- trexate: a report of two cases [ J ]. Acta Obstet Cynecol Scand, 2004,83 ( 1 ) : 108.

引证文献7

二级引证文献61

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部