期刊文献+

英美证据关联性之内涵与性质的再界定 被引量:1

Re-thinking of the Conception and Nature of Relevancy in Anglo-American Legal System
下载PDF
导出
摘要 关联性是证据法领域的基础性概念,对此国内外学者分别提出了不同的观点。对于关联性内涵的把握,关键不在于定义性的语言表述,而在于对其所蕴含之根本特征与内在价值的理解。关联性是存在于证据和待证事实之间的相对性概念,是形式意义和实质意义两方面含义的整合。"法律上的关联性"所承载的价值功能,完全可以通过完善相应的可采性规则而实现;证据能力和证明力这两个概念本身存在着内容上相互对应以及程度上逐渐递进的关系,而此种递进关系在关联性方面表现得尤为明显。就证据内涵而言,关联性为其根本,但不宜冠以"属性"之名。证据能力、可采性及证明力是三个相互关联又有区别的概念,对于具备可采性的证据,其证明力一般随着关联性的增强而增大,此一过程系通过逻辑推理和经验法则的共同作用而实现。 As a foundational role in the field of evidence law, Relevancy has initiated various opinions among scholars all over the world. This paper establishes revelancy's suhstantive characteristics and intrinsic value rather than its surficial definition as a matter of priority and puts forward ideas as follows: Revelancy, which consists of both formal and substantial meaning, plays a relative role between evidence material and the facts to be proved. The goal for "legal relevance" can be achieved by the rules of admissibility. There is progressive relation btween "competency of evidence" and "probative force", which appears more distinctly in the field of revelancy. As for the connotation of evidence, revelancy is the prime and essential factor. "Competency of evidence", "admissibility " and "probative force" are three different concepts. The probative force of evidence that fit the admissibility's requirements increases along with the level of revelancy, which is a kind of process by means of both logical reasoning and the rule of thumb.
作者 吴逾
出处 《成都理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 2011年第2期62-68,共7页 Journal of Chengdu University of Technology:Social Sciences
关键词 关联性 证据能力 可采性 relevancy competency of evidence admissiability
  • 引文网络
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1余亮.证据相关性研究[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2008:15.
  • 2[美] 乔恩·R·华尔兹.刑事证据大全[M].何家弘,等,译.北京:中国人民公安大学出版社,2004:81.
  • 3江伟.证据法学[M].北京:法律出版社,2004..
  • 4R O.Lemoert,S A.Salzburg.A Modern Approach to Evidence:Text,Problem,Transcripts and Cases[M].West Publishing Co,p.153(2nd ed.1982).
  • 5约翰·W·斯特龙.麦考密克论证据[M].汤维建,译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,2004.
  • 6[美] 罗纳德·J·艾伦,理查德·B·库恩斯,埃莉诺·斯威夫特.证据法--文本、问题和案例[M].张保生,王进喜,赵滢,译.第三版.北京:高等教育出版社,2006:149.
  • 7[德]阿图尔·考夫曼.当代法哲学和法律理论导论[M].郑永流.北京:法律出版社,2002.
  • 8何家弘 张卫平.外国证据法选译[M].北京:人民法院出版社,2002..
  • 9汤维建.关于证据属性的若干思考和讨论——以证据的客观性为中心[J].政法论坛,2000,18(6):127-139. 被引量:102
  • 10梁玉霞.什么是证据--反思性重塑[C] //证据学论坛(第三卷).北京:人民检察出版社2001:359-366.

二级参考文献1

  • 1崔敏等.刑事证据理论研究综述[M]中国人民公安大学出版社,1990.

共引文献182

同被引文献4

引证文献1

;
使用帮助 返回顶部