从方舟子遇袭案谈立案标准在刑法中的适用

Criteria and Application of Case-filing and Sentencing on Criminal law from Fang Case

在刑事法领域,立案标准应是司法人员认定犯罪时的参照标准,但在实践中,立案标准的功能却被无限扩大化,以致于被视为是认定犯罪成立与否的唯一标准。这种功能的错位,导致一方面将虽符合立案标准但情节显著轻微的行为认定为犯罪,另一方面又将虽不符合立案标准但具有其他严重情节的行为一概不认定为犯罪,这便出现司法中许多案件的处理结果不能为民众所接受的状况。要改变这种现状,首先,要对立案标准的性质作正确认定,即立案标准属于司法解释而非法律本身,立案标准是认定犯罪的重要参照因素但非唯一标准;其次,在司法操作中应当赋予法官一定的法律解释权,唯有如此,才可以使法官真正做到以刑法条文为根据,结合立案标准和案件中的其他情节进行综合考量,从而对某种犯罪的成立与否进行合理认定。

In the field of criminal law,the filing should be the judicial officer finds that the standard time of the crime of reference,but in practice,been placed on file the standard features unlimited expansion,so that is seen as the only established or recognized standards of crime.The function of dislocation,resulting in one hand,although consistent filing standards,but the circumstances are obviously minor acts recognized as crimes,although not consistent with the other filing standards will have other serious circumstances,but not and will not recognized as criminal acts,which directly led to the Justice in the handling of many cases results can not be accepted as the status of the population.To change this situation,we must first make the correct filing identified the nature of the standard,that standard filing of a judicial interpretation,rather than the law itself,filing criminal standard is recognized an important factor but not the only standard reference;Second,in the judicial operations should be given some legal interpretation of the judge,the only way that can only really judge based on the provisions of the Criminal Code,with the case filing standards and comprehensive consideration of other circumstances,and thus a crime Identified the establishment of reasonable or not.