期刊文献+

美英两国高校教师绩效评价制度比较与思考 被引量:22

The Comparison and Thinking of Performance Evaluation System of College Teachers in America and England
下载PDF
导出
摘要 高校教师绩效评价在学术界存在发展性评价和奖惩性评价两种价值取向的争论,同时在实践中也存在分别以美英两国为代表的两类评价模式。美国奖惩性教师绩效评价具有多重特色和优点,然而也面临诸多非议;英国高校教师绩效评价机制早期重奖惩,后转向注重教师专业发展,虽有所长却鲜见实效,现又寻求奖惩而深陷困境。两国评价制度改革的反复过程以事实胜于雄辩的力量证实了一个道理:完善高校教师绩效评价体系应坚持发展与奖惩并重。 The performance evaluation of college teachers exists two kinds of dispute in academic circles,and also two types of appraisal practice mode in England and America at the same time.The performance appraisal of America has multiple features and advantages,but also faces many hostile opinions;The performance evaluation mechanism of England practiced prize and punishment in early days,and changed to promote teachers'profession development later.It has some advantages but bad results,now it faces a new reform.Two countries'evaluation system reform confirmed a truth that perfect the performance evaluation system of college teachers should insist to develop and to encourage teachers together.
作者 夏茂林
出处 《湖南师范大学教育科学学报》 CSSCI 2011年第1期74-77,共4页 Journal of Educational Science of Hunan Normal University
关键词 高校教师 绩效 评价 college teachers performance evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献35

  • 1孙玉娟.浅谈发展性教师评价[J].延边教育学院学报,2004,18(3):12-15. 被引量:5
  • 2林济霖.我国当今教师评价的弊端及对策思考[J].广州广播电视大学学报,2003,3(2):20-24. 被引量:6
  • 3李长华,曾晓东.美国高校教师绩效评价存在的争议[J].外国教育研究,2004,31(11):40-43. 被引量:45
  • 4夏妍,张怀菊.美国大学教师绩效评价研究[J].世界教育信息,2006,19(9):51-53. 被引量:19
  • 5[2]Differentiated Workloads.[DB/OL].http://www.colorado.edu/facultyaffairs/deskref/part4differentiatedwork.htm.
  • 6[3]Annual Merit Evaluation:Advice and Comments[DB/OL].http://www.colorado.edu/facultyaffairs/atoz/ann_merit_eval_form00.rtf.
  • 7[4]Stuart Palmer.The Universities Today:Scholarship,self-interest and politics[M].United Press of America,1998.45.
  • 8[5]Richard P.Chait.The Questions of Tenure[M].Havard University Press,2002.48.
  • 9[6]Sample Solicitation Letter for Outside Referees.[DB/OL].http://www.utexas.edu/provost/policies/evaluation/tenure/TTT_SampleLetter_F06_.pdf.
  • 10[7]Jeffrey W.Alstete.Post-tenure Faculty Development:Building a System for Faculty Improvement and Appreciation[M].2000.2.

共引文献117

同被引文献150

引证文献22

二级引证文献69

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部