摘要
"危急情况"是国际投资仲裁中新近出现的东道国抗辩事由,却遭遇了难以得到认可且裁决不统一的困境。通过研究仲裁庭与实体法规则这两项对仲裁结果产生直接影响的因素,并结合阿根廷ICSID案例进行分析,认为,使"危急情况"抗辩陷入困境的主要原因是实体法之缺陷,因而其法律进路在于修正《国家责任法草案》中的习惯法标准并完善投资条约中东道国的自我防御机制。
The defense of Necessity,a brand new defense in international investment arbitration,is hard to be supported by ICSID tribunals and all relating awards are inconsistent.Based on the analysis of the tribunal and substantive law with certain ICSID cases,it is obvious that some defects of substantive law adversely affect the＂Necessity＂.Therefore,the customary criteria should be revised,and meanwhile host states should refine the self-defense mechanism in BITs.
出处
《经济研究导刊》
2011年第6期108-111,113,共5页
Economic Research Guide
