国家公园试点效果对比分析——以普达措和轿子山为例

Comparative Study of Management Effect on Pilot National Parks——A Case Study on Pudacuo National Park and Jiaozhishan Nature Reserve

对2个同时建立、基本条件类似但建设路径不同的碧塔海自然保护区和昆明轿子山自然保护区的自然条件和建设效果进行对比分析,结果表明:碧塔海省级自然保护区被纳入普达措国家公园进行管理之后取得了良好的保护和发展效果,而轿子山自然保护区按照常规的自然保护区建设模式进行建设,目前处境尴尬。可见国家公园是一种很好的管理模式,在我国有较好的发展前景,是对自然保护区的一种有益补充,具有较强的推广价值。

A comparative study was conducted on the natural conditions and the building effect of the Bitahai Nature Reserve and the Jiaozishan Nature Reserve, a pair of nature reserves built at the same time based on the similar foundation but developed in different approaches. The results showed that the Bitahai Nature Reserve developed well and was well conserved after having been integrated with Pudacuo National Park management regime. However, the Jiaozishan Nature Reserve remained in an awkward economic status being short of self-support capacity because it had been managed by the traditional management regime for the regular nature reserves. Due to choosing a different mode of management, there were great differences in the protection and development effects of the two protected areas. It was showed that the management regime for National Park would be an approach with bright development prospect, and it would be an useful supplement to the management model to nature reserves with great extension value.