摘要
梁启超和孙中山针对清末民初财政困难,币制混乱的状况都旗帜鲜明地提出了自己的货币主张,形成了各具特色的货币思想。由于社会经历和认识角度的不同,二者存在着一定的异同。梁启超和孙中山在货币本质认识方面都存在着一定的缺陷;关于中国究竟实行什么样的货币本位制问题,梁启超前后多变但总体能够抓住货币本位发展的趋势,而孙中山主张学习日本实行金本位制,但实际却提出缺乏可行性的实物本位制构想;梁启超对纸币的态度是消极的,而孙中山则准确预见到货币发展的动向,积极主张发行纸币。
Aimed at the financial difficulties and disorder of currency system at the end of Qing dynasty,both Liang Qichao and Sun Yat-Sen proposed their own monetary policy,which came into monetary theories with distinguishing features.For the differences of personal experiences and views,there are a certain similarities and differences in the two monetary theories.Liang and Sun's view of the nature of currency existed some shortcomings;as for the issue of what kind of monetary standard should be used in China,Liang though was changeable,grasped the developmental tendency of monetary standard;and yet Sun advocated implement the Japanese gold standard,but in fact proposed a frame of material standard without feasibility;Liang had a passive attitude toward paper money,yet Sun had predicted trend of monetary development correctly and advocated positively to distribute paper money.
出处
《江南大学学报(人文社会科学版)》
2011年第1期74-79,共6页
Journal of Jiangnan University:Humanities & Social Sciences Edition
关键词
梁启超
孙中山
货币思想
比较
认识根源
启示
Liang Qichao
Sun Yat-Sen
Monetary Thoughts
Comparison
Cognitive Root
Enlightment