期刊文献+

PPH结合电刀治疗重度混合痔的临床疗效 被引量:2

PPH Combined with Electrotome in the Treatment of Severe Mixed Hemorrhoids: Clinical Therapeutic Effect Study
原文传递
导出
摘要 为探讨吻合器痔上黏膜环切术(PPH)结合电刀治疗重度混合痔的临床疗效,回顾分析采用PPH结合电刀治疗(PPH组)或外剥内扎治疗(外剥内扎组)的重度混合痔患者的资料,对手术治疗结果进行对比分析。结果显示,两组患者手术均获成功,均无复发病例,临床疗效无明显差异,但PPH组在手术时间、住院时间、创口愈合时间及术后疼痛、出血、水肿、尿潴留、肛门控便能力、皮赘及痔核残留等方面明显优于外剥内扎术组。结果表明,PPH结合电刀治疗重度混合痔是一种安全有效的手术方式,具有手术时间短、术后恢复快、并发症少等优点,较传统的外剥内扎术具有明显的优势,值得临床推广和应用。 The objective of the study was to investigate the clinical therapeutic effect of the combination therapy(PPH plus electrotome) for severe mixed hemorrhoids. Authors analysed the data from patients received the combined therapy (as treatment group,i, e PPH group) or external dissection & internal ligation (as controlled group) for their severe mixed hemorrhoids,and compared their operative outcomes. As results ,the operation of both groups was performed successfully,no recurrence was found, and there was no significant difference in therapeutic effect between both groups;but in operation time,hospitalization duration, healing time of wound, as well as postoperative pain, bleeding, edema, urine retention, anal control ability for defecation, skin tag and hemorrhoids residue, and so on,PPH group was all superior to controlled group. Results show that PPH combined with electrotome for severe mixed hemorrhoids is safe and effective, and has such advantages as shorter operation time, faster recovery at postoperation,and less complication,etc,all superior to routine procedure,is worthy to be popularized and used clinically.
出处 《中国肛肠病杂志》 2011年第2期39-41,共3页 Chinese Journal of Coloproctology
关键词 吻合器痔上黏膜环切术 外剥内扎术 疗效 Hemorrhoid Procedure for prolapse and Therapeutic effect hemorrhoids External dissection internal ligation
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献10

  • 1Mehigan BJ, Monson JR, Hartley JE. Stapling procedure for haemorrhoids versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 2000,355 : 782- 785.
  • 2Shalaby R, Desoky A. Randomized clinical trial of stapled versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy, Br J Surg, 2001,88:1049-1053.
  • 3Longo A. Treatment of haemorrhoid disease by reduction of mueosa and haemorrhoidal prolapse with a circular suturing device: a new procedure. Proceedings of the 6th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery. Rome Italy. 1998.3.
  • 4Domenico Palimento, Marcello Picchio, Ugo Attanasio, et al. Stapled and open hemorrhoidectomy randomized con trolled trial of early results. World J Surg, 2003,27 : 203- 207.
  • 5Law WL, Chu KW. Triple rubber band ligation for hemorrhoids:prospective, randomized trial of use of local anes thetic injection. Dis Colon Rectum, 1999,42:363-366.
  • 6史兆岐,中国大肠肛门病学,1985年,631页
  • 7Murie J A,Br J Surg,1982年,69卷,9期,536页
  • 8张诚龙,牛伟新,姚礼庆,秦新裕.硬化剂注射疗法治疗内痔对肛管压力的影响[J].中国内镜杂志,1997,3(6):1-2. 被引量:8
  • 9何道钰,黄茜.注射疗法在肛肠疾病中的应用[J].中国肛肠病杂志,2000,20(5):34-36. 被引量:20
  • 10胡丰良,李玉英,李洪杰,罗维民,伍凯盈.四点牵引法在痔PPH术中的应用(附39例报告)[J].大肠肛门病外科杂志,2003,9(2):97-99. 被引量:27

共引文献321

同被引文献7

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部