期刊文献+

替考拉宁与左氧氟沙星、利福平联用对耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的体外抗菌活性研究

Study on Comhined Use of Teicoplanin with Levofloxacin Rifampicin Against Methicillin Resistance Staphylococcus Aureus
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的了解替考拉宁与左氧氟沙星、利福平联合应用对耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)的体外抗菌活性,为临床合理用药提供帮助。方法常规方法培养分离细菌,用VITEK-Ⅱ微生物自动分析仪鉴定到种。MRSA鉴定采用乳胶凝集试剂盒,最低抑菌浓度(MIC)测定采用微量肉汤稀释法。结果替考拉宁、左氧氟沙星、利福平单独用药对110株MR—SA的MIC90分别为4.0,64.0,256.0mg/L,而抑菌率分别为100.0%,5.0%和28.0%。替考拉宁与左氧氟沙星、利福平联合用药后MIC90均为4.0mg/L,FIC〈1的值分别为35.0%和69.0%。结论替考拉宁与左氧氟沙星、利福平联合用药对MRSA的MIC90比单药提高4倍以上。替考拉宁与利福平联合应用以协同作用为主。临床上治疗由MRSA引起的感染应根据患者的个体情况并结合药敏试验结果联合应用抗菌药物。 Objective To understand in vitro antibacterial activity of Combined use of Teicoplanin (TEC) with Levofloxacin (LVX) and Rifampicin (RIF) against methicillin resistance Staphylococcu aureus(MRSA) in order to provide help for rational drug use to clinic. Methods Isolates were cultured and identified by routine procedure and VITEK- I automatic microbe analysis instrument. MRSA detection used latex coagulation method. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) used micro-broth dilution method in Accordance with CLSI standard. Results The MIC90 of TEC,LVX and RIF against 110 strains MRS were 4.0, 64. 0 mg/L and 256. 0 mg/L,their inhibitory bacteria rates were 100. 0%, 5.0% and 28.0% respectively. The MICgo of combined use of TEC with LVX,RIF were 4. 0,4.0 mg/L,their value of FIC〈1 were 35.0% and 69.0% respectively. Conclusion TEC combining with RIF were main synergism that antibacterial activity en- hanced above four times. Clinic should be according to patient indivudial situation and drug sensitive test results to be best to choose combined use of drug to treat severe infection against MRSA.
出处 《现代检验医学杂志》 CAS 2011年第1期100-101,共2页 Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine
关键词 耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌 抗菌药物 最低抑菌浓度 联合用药 rnethicillin resistance Staphylococcu aureus (MRSA) antimicrobial agents minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) combined use of drug
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献22

  • 1[3]Kouda M, Hommas S, udagaWa I. Evaluation of the activity and effects of combinations of various antibacterial agents against methicllin resistant Staphylococcus aureus in vitro [J]. Jpn J Antibiot, 2000,53: 171
  • 2苏建荣,马纪平,许淑珍.抗菌药物联用对耐甲氧耐药表皮等球菌的抗菌活性[J].中华医学检验杂志,1999,22(增刊):47.
  • 3Rex JH, Pfaller MA, Walsh TJ, et al. Antifungal susceptibility testing :practical aspects and current challenges.Clin Microbiol Rev,2001,14:643-658.
  • 4Verweij PE, Van den Bergh MF, Rath PM, et al. Invasive aspergillosisi caused by aspergillus ustus:case report and review.Clin Microbiol,1999,37:1606-1609.
  • 5Moore CB,Walls CM,Denning DW.In vitro activities of terbinafine against aspergillus species in comparison with those of itraconazole and amphotericin B.Antimicrob Agents Chemother,2001,45:1882-1885.
  • 6Te Dorsthorst DT,Verweij PE,Meis JF,et al.Comparison of fractional inhibitory concentration index with response surface modeling for characterization of in vitro interaction of antifungals against itraconazole -susceptible and resistant aspergillus fumigatus isolates.Antimicrob Agents Chemother,2002, 46:702-707.
  • 7Ryder NS, Leitner L. Synergistic interaction of terbinaflne with triazoles or amphotericin B against Aspergillus species.Med Mycol,2001,39:91-95.
  • 8Barchiesi F, Falconi DiFrancesco L, Scalise G, et al. In vitro activities of terbinafine in combination with fluconazole and itraconazole against isolates of Candida albicans with reduced susceptibility to azoes.Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 1997,41:1812-1814.
  • 9Kontoyiannis P, Lewis RE, Sagar N, et al. Itraconazole-amphotericin B antagonism in Aspergillus fumigatus:an E-test -based strategy .Antimicrob Agents Chemother ,2000,44:2915-2918.
  • 10Mosquera J, Sharp A, Moore CB, et al. In vitro interaction of terbinafine with itraconazole, fluconazole ,amphotericin B and 5-flucytosine against Aspergillus spp.Antimicrob Chemother , 2002,50 : 189-194.

共引文献51

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部