期刊文献+

具有偏好关系网络结构稳定的群决策协商控制模型

Group decision-making controllable model with preference relations network structure stabilization
原文传递
导出
摘要 挖掘群决策偏好关系结构信息,提出决策者个体偏好与群体偏好关系以及网络结构稳定的群决策协商控制模型.根据模型提供个体偏好参考基准,计算决策者及群体的偏好相容性测度.通过决策者建立、取消(断开)或加强与其他决策者的链接以及对偏好信息进行调整的策略建议,促使决策者个体偏好、群决策偏好关系网络结构正向演化,在模型框架下保证群体偏好网络结构稳定,达到群体偏好信息相容性极大的目的,为进一步信息集结提供依据. This paper introduces a model for group decision-making problem based on both the preferences of decision- makers and the group and the stability of network structure. References of the individual preferences are provided according to the model, and the measurement of preferences consistency about both decision-makers and the group is calculated. The decision-makers establish, cancel(disconnect) or strength the links between others, and regulate their preferences in the model. Both decision-makers preferences and the group preferences network structure can develop to the positive evolution in the model. Structural stability of the group preferences network structure can be guaranteed, and the group preferences consistency maximization is achieved, which provide more convenient solutions for information aggregation .
出处 《控制与决策》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2011年第3期363-368,共6页 Control and Decision
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(71071030 71071031).
关键词 群决策 协商过程 偏好关系网络结构 偏好相容性测度 group decision making consensus process the network structure of preference measurement of preference consistency
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Mata F, Martinez L, Harrera-Viedma E. An adaptive consensus support model for group decision-making problems in a multigranular fuzzy linguistic context[J]. IEEE Trans on Fuzzy Systems, 2009, 17(2): 279-290.
  • 2Herrera-Viedma E, Alonso S, Chiclana F. A consensus model for group decision making with incomplete fuzzy preference relations[J]. IEEE Trans on Fuzzy Systems, 2008, 15(5): 863-877.
  • 3Herrera-Viedma E, Chiclana F, Herrera E Group decision- making model with incomplete fuzzy preference relations based on additive consistency[J]. IEEE Trans on System, Man, and Cybernetics-Part B: Cybernetics, 2007, 37(1): 176-189.
  • 4Glaser C, Heckmann M, Joublin E et al. Combining auditory preprocessing and Bayesian estimation for robust formant tracking[J]. IEEE Trans on Audio, Speech and Language Processing, 2010, 18(2): 224-236.
  • 5Basturk A, Gunay E. Efficient edge detection in digital images using a celluar neural network optinized by differential evolution algorithm[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2009, 36(5): 2645-2650.
  • 6Chiclana E Herrera-Viedma E, Alonso S, et al. Cardinal consistency of reciprocal preference relations: A characterization of multiplicative transitivity[J]. IEEE Trans on Fuzzy Systems, 2009, 17(1): 14-23.
  • 7Herrera E Herrera-Viedma E, Martnez L. A fuzzy linguistic methodology to deal with unbalanced linguistic term sets[J]. IEEE Trans on Fuzzy Systems, 2008, 16(2): 354-370.
  • 8Rahman Md A, Saddik A El, Gueaieb W. Building dynamic social network from sensory data feed[J]. IEEE Trans on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2010, 59(5): 1327- 1341.
  • 9Kobashikawa C, Hatakeyama Y, Dong E et al. Fuzzy algorithm for group decision making with participants having finite discriminating abilities[J]. IEEE Trans on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans, 2009, 39(1): 86-97.
  • 10Yager R. OWA aggregation over a continuous interval argument with applications to decision making[J]. IEEE Trans on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part B: Cybernetics, 2004, 34(5): 1952-1963.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部