期刊文献+

整体历史观下的社会主义法治理念的解读 被引量:2

原文传递
导出
摘要 社会主义法治理念的提出,至少可能有三个方面的重要意义:一是它必定会引发法律或司法的形式性与实质性关系之思,二是它可能会引发人们对法治发展的历史性与现实性之思,三是它可能会引起学界对法学学科的属性和法学教育之思。在此,笔者力图将这三种思考纳入一种整体历史视野之下。
作者 夏立安
出处 《山东社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第3期5-8,共4页 Shandong Social Sciences
基金 国家211课题"转型期法治的理论 制度与实证研究"的系列研究成果之一
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1高鸿钧.现代法治的困境及其出路[J].法学研究,2003,25(2):3-31. 被引量:84
  • 2S. P. Garvey, "Punishment as Atonement", UCLA Law Review, Vol. 46 ( 1999 ), pp. 1850-1853.
  • 3[波兰]埃娃·多曼斯卡编.邂逅.《后现代主义之后的历史哲学》,彭刚译,北京大学出版社2007年版,第46页.
  • 4H. J. Berman, "Toward an Integrative Jurisprudence . Politics, Morality, History", California Law Review, Vol. 76 ( 1988 ), pp. 789.
  • 5William J. Novak, Law, Capitalism, and the Liberal State. The Historical Sociology of James Willard Hurst, 18 Law & Hist. Rev. 97, Spring, 2000, P. 98.
  • 6Theda Skocpol, "Sociology's Historical Imagination," in Vision and Method in Historical Sociology, ed. Theda Skocpol (Cambridge. Cambridge University Press, 1984), 1-21,8,4.
  • 7Dennis Smith, The Rise of Historical Sociology (Philadelphia. Temple University Press, 1991),3.
  • 8M. D. A. Freeman, Lloyd's Introduction to Jurisprudence, (Sweet and Maxwell, Ltd,2001 ), 1.

二级参考文献10

  • 1R.M.Unger, Lasc in Modern Society: Toward a Criticism of Social Theory, The Free Press, 1976,pp.53-54.
  • 2G.Gilmore, The Death of Contract, Ohio State University Press, 1974.
  • 3R.M.Unger, Lasc in Modern Society: Toward a Criticism of Social Theory, The Free Press, 1976,pp.193-200.
  • 4G.de Q.Walker, The Rule of Law. Foundation of Constitutional Democracy, Melbourne University Press, 1988,Chapter 2.
  • 5M. Weber, Economy and Society : An Outline Interpretive Sociology, trans.by E.Fischoff et al, University of California Press, 1978, p. 954.
  • 6J.Habermas, The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol.2, trans,by T. McCarthy, Beacon Press,1987,pp,347--350.
  • 7R. Cotterrell, Law' s Community : Legal Theory in Sociological Perspective, Clarendon Press, 1995,pp.315--337.
  • 8M.Taylor, Community, Anarchy and Liberty, Cambridge University Press, 1982, pp.25--33.
  • 9J.Habermas, Between Facts and Norms( Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Low and Democracy 》,transl.by W.Rehg,Polity Press, 1996,pp.402--407.
  • 10Kjell A Modeer, “European Legal Cultures: Traditions and Cultures in Contempory Eumpe,”in Tuuli Forgren & Martin Peteraon(eds.》, Cultural Crossroads in Europe, Produktion: Ord & Form AB, Uppsala, 1997, pp.73--75.

共引文献83

同被引文献20

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部