期刊文献+

离体兔眼试验在检测农药眼刺激性方面的初步研究

原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨离体兔眼(IRE)试验作为兔眼刺激性试验(Draize test)检测农药眼刺激性的替代方法的适用性。方法选取29种市售农药进行离体兔眼试验,并同步按照GB15670—1995《农药登记毒理学试验方法》进行兔眼刺激性试验,对试验结果进行相关性和一致性分析。结果 IRE试验检测农药眼刺激性分级结果与Draize试验分级结果的差别无统计学意义(McNemar-BowkerW=3.33,P>0.05);Gamma=0.98(P<0.01),Kappa=0.68(P<0.01),显示2种试验方法之间的一致性较好;相关系数为0.86(P<0.01),显示两者之间的相关性较好。结论 IRE试验检测农药眼刺激性的分级结果与Draize试验分级结果的相关性和一致性较好I,RE试验可作为筛选无/轻刺激性农药的替代方法,是一种比较有潜力的眼刺激替代试验方法。
出处 《华南预防医学》 2011年第1期60-62,共3页 South China Journal of Preventive Medicine
基金 公益性行业科研专项经费(200802080)
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1WILHELMUS K R. The Draize eye test [ J]. Surv Ophthalmol, 2001, 45(6) :493 -515.
  • 2郭翔,杨杏芬.离体器官模型在眼刺激试验中的应用进展[J].国外医学(卫生学分册),2008,35(4):244-249. 被引量:3
  • 3BURTON A B G, YORK M, LAWRENCE R S. The in vitro ass- wssment of 1V eye irritants[ J ]. Food and Cosmetics Toxicology, 1981, 19:471 -480.
  • 4EC. Regutation No 1907/2006 of the european parliament and of the council[ J ]. Official Journal of the European Union, 2007,29 (5) :L136/1 - L1366/280.
  • 5ECVAM. INVITTOX protocol No. 85: rabbit enucleated eye test [ EB/OL ]. [2007 - 06 - 01 ]. http://ecvam-dbalm, jrc. ec. europa, eu/.
  • 6BALLS M, BOTHAM P A, BRUNERS L H, et al. The EC/HO international validation study on ahernatives to the Draize eye irritation test [J]. Toxicol in Vitro, 1995, 9(6) : 871 -929.
  • 7GETTINGS S D, I.ORDO R A, HINTZE K L, et al. The CTFA evaluation of alternative program : an evaluation of in vitro alternative to the Draize primary eye irritation test ( phase Ⅲ ) surfactant- based formulations [ J ]. Food Chem Toxicol, 1996, 34 ( 1 ) : 79 - 117.

二级参考文献32

  • 1周建嫦,杨明杰,杨杏芬,贺锡雯.眼刺激试验离体替代方法研究进展[J].卫生研究,2004,33(4):515-517. 被引量:7
  • 2张文改,杨杏芬.眼刺激试验的替代方法及应用策略研究进展[J].华南预防医学,2007,33(1):27-31. 被引量:11
  • 3GAUTHERON P, DUKIC M, ALIX D. Bovine corneal opacity and permeability test: an in vitro assay of ocular irritancy[J]. Fundam Appl Toxicol, 1992,18 : 442-449.
  • 4UBELS J L, PRUIS R M, SYBESMA J T, et al. Corneal opacity,hydration and endothelial morphology in the bovine cornea opacity and permeability assay using reduced treatment times[J]. Toxicol In Vitro,2000,14: 379-386.
  • 5CATER K C, HARBELL J W. Prediction of eye irritation potential of surfactant-based rinse-off personal care formulations by the bovine corneal opacity and permeability (BCOP) assay[J]. Cutan Ocul Toxicol,2006,25(3) :217-233.
  • 6VANPARYS P, DEKNUDT G, SYSMANS M, et al. Evaluation of the bovine corneal opacity permeability assay as an in vitro alternative to the Draize eye irritation test[J]. Toxicol In Vitro, 1993,7 : 471-476.
  • 7GAUTHERON P, GIROUX J, COTTIN M, et al. Interlaboratory assessment of the bovine corneal opacity and permeability (BCOP) assay[J]. Toxicol In Vitro, 1994,8 : 381-392.
  • 8BALLS M, BOTHAM P A, BRUNERS L H, et al. The EC/ HO international validation study on alternatives to the Draize eye irritation test[ J]. Toxicol In Vitro, 1995,6: 871- 929.
  • 9GETTINGS S D, LORDO R A, HINTZE K L, et al. The CTFA evaluation of alternative program: an evaluation of in vitro alternative to the Draize primary eye irritation test (phase Ⅲ ) surfactant-based formulation.s[ J] . Food Chem Toxicol, 1996,34 : 79-117.
  • 10CHAMBERLAIN M, GAD 1RAG working group 1 S C, GAUTHERON P, et al. organotypic models for the assessment/prediction of ocular irritation [ J ]. Food Chem Toxicol, 1997,35 : 23-37.

共引文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部