摘要
通过对比写作教学中的结果教学法与过程教学法的两种不同的作文评改模式,指出了结果教学法的写作评改模式由于沿用的是传统的教师评改、学生一次一稿的写作教学模式,因而存在着缺少师生互动等弊端。而过程教学法的写作评改模式是由同伴互评。通过为期一个学期的写作实践教学及问卷调查论证了同伴互评模式比传统的教师评阅模式能更有利地促进学生写作水平的提高,并且更有利地促进学生第二语言习得的发展。
By comparing the two different composition reviewing modes in writing teaching: product approach and process approach, this paper points out that product approach lacks teacher-student interaction because it follows the traditional writing teach- ing model that the teacher reviews the composition and the student writes a draft at a time whereas the writing reviewing mode of process approach is peer evaluation. Based on one semester's teaching practice and the questionnaire, this paper demonstrates peer evaluation mode can improve students' writing ability more favorably then that of traditional teacher evaluation mode and further promote the de- velopment of students' second language acquisition.
出处
《长春理工大学学报(社会科学版)》
2011年第2期147-149,共3页
Journal of Changchun University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences Edition)
基金
仲恺农业工程学院教研课题"大学英语写作教学及作文评改模式的研究"(G2071956)
关键词
结果教学法
过程教学法
同伴互评
反馈
product approach
process approach
peer evaluation approach
feedback